Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMAX vs LMCRX
JVMAX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMAX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap A
Price$26.29
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.61B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$32.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
JVMAX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMAX vs. LMCRX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMAX is a Buy and LMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMAX has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. LMCRX (1.07B). JVMAX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: JVMAX (0.60) vs LMCRX (0.32). JVMAX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMAX (28 years) vs LMCRX (17 years). LMCRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JVMAX (1.13). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMAX (49.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMAX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMAX (1000). JVMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.58 vs. LMCRX (-6.00). JVMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.10 vs. LMCRX (37.43).
| JVMAX | LMCRX | JVMAX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.28 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.28 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.423 | -3.812 | -90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6B | 1.07B | 2,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.32 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.58 | -6.00 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.21 | 16.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.10 | 37.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.90 | 23.12 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement