Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs LLPFX
JVMCX vs LLPFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs LLPFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.20
Change-$0.20 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.57B
JVMCX vs LLPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. LLPFX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and LLPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LLPFX (1.22B). LLPFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: LLPFX (1.02) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than LLPFX: JVMCX (14 years) vs LLPFX (38 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than LLPFX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. LLPFX (38.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLPFX: JVMCX (1000) vs LLPFX (10000). LLPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.66 vs. JVMCX (-0.48). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. LLPFX (52.62).
| JVMCX | LLPFX | JVMCX / LLPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.79 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.97 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.510 | 3.454 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 10000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.22B | 1,849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.48 | 10.66 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.85 | 24.15 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.34 | 52.62 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.22 | -6.90 | -482% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement