Ad is loading...
JVMSX vs NBMRX
JVMSX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMSX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$25.48
Change+$0.42 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.84B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$23.34
Change+$0.53 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.16M
JVMSX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMSX vs. NBMRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMSX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. NBMRX (46.2M). NBMRX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: NBMRX (0.87) vs JVMSX (0.45). JVMSX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMSX (13 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMSX (1.26). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). JVMSX (0) and NBMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NBMRX (-11.10) and JVMSX (-11.28) have marching annual gain over last year. NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 77.73 vs. JVMSX (51.96).
| JVMSX | NBMRX | JVMSX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.75 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.72 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.527 | -13.072 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8B | 46.2M | 42,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.87 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.28 | -11.10 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.15 | -7.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.96 | 77.73 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...