Ad is loading...
K
Price
$81.02
Change
+$0.24 (+0.30%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
76 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$76.75
Change
+$0.64 (+0.84%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

K vs LW

Header iconK vs LW Comparison
Open Charts K vs LWBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$81.02
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
Volume$1.83M
CapitalizationN/A
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$76.75
Change+$0.64 (+0.84%)
Volume$1.27M
CapitalizationN/A
K vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. LW commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a StrongBuy and LW is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (K: $81.02 vs. LW: $76.75)
Brand notoriety: K and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 92% vs. LW: 50%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. LW: $15.38B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than LW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.89% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LW($15.4B). K has higher P/E ratio than LW: K (25.36) vs LW (13.62). K YTD gains are higher at: 48.796 vs. LW (-27.658). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than K: LW (3.63B) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than LW: K (13.1B) vs LW (6.35B).
KLWK / LW
Capitalization19.5B15.4B127%
EBITDA1.76B1.34B131%
Gain YTD48.796-27.658-176%
P/E Ratio25.3613.62186%
Revenue13.1B6.35B206%
Total Cash274MN/A-
Total Debt6.53B3.63B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
K
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6473
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2089
SMR RATING
1..100
3826
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5038

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (31) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (48) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as K (38) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (55) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as K (43) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CROX101.813.22
+3.27%
Crocs
CRKN0.800.01
+1.57%
Crown Electrokinetics Corp.
FPI12.35-0.06
-0.48%
Farmland Partners
NB1.36-0.02
-1.45%
NioCorp Developments Ltd
CENX22.61-0.47
-2.04%
Century Aluminum Company

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, K has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if K jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
+0.30%
GIS - K
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CPB - K
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
SMPL - K
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
DAR - K
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
KHC - K
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.84%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.56%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
More