K
Price
$79.00
Change
+$0.18 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.5B
31 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$53.40
Change
+$0.21 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

K vs LW

Header iconK vs LW Comparison
Open Charts K vs LWBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$79.00
Change+$0.18 (+0.23%)
Volume$4.95M
Capitalization19.5B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$53.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.39%)
Volume$3.56M
Capitalization15.38B
K vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. LW commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a Buy and LW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (K: $79.00 vs. LW: $53.40)
Brand notoriety: K and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 140% vs. LW: 214%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. LW: $15.38B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both K and LW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than K.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.37% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LW($15.4B). K has higher P/E ratio than LW: K (25.36) vs LW (13.62). K YTD gains are higher at: -1.075 vs. LW (-19.038). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than K: LW (3.63B) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than LW: K (13.1B) vs LW (6.35B).
KLWK / LW
Capitalization19.5B15.4B127%
EBITDA1.76B1.34B131%
Gain YTD-1.075-19.0386%
P/E Ratio25.3613.62186%
Revenue13.1B6.35B206%
Total Cash274MN/A-
Total Debt6.53B3.63B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
K
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
2542
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7510
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as K (39) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (25) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for K (75) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than K’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEHL2.700.10
+3.85%
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Limited
BRAG4.250.03
+0.71%
Bragg Gaming Group
RS316.812.16
+0.69%
Reliance
CLW27.93-0.05
-0.18%
Clearwater Paper Corp
BNL16.16-0.07
-0.43%
Broadstone Net Lease

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that K and HAIN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that K and HAIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
+0.23%
HAIN - K
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
NOMD - K
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
UTZ - K
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
JBSS - K
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
LW - K
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.39%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
POST - LW
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
THS - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
INGR - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
BYND - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More