K
Price
$82.77
Change
-$0.08 (-0.10%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.5B
6 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$52.60
Change
+$0.16 (+0.31%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

K vs LW

Header iconK vs LW Comparison
Open Charts K vs LWBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$82.77
Change-$0.08 (-0.10%)
Volume$3.28M
Capitalization19.5B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$52.60
Change+$0.16 (+0.31%)
Volume$1.33M
Capitalization15.38B
K vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. LW commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a Buy and LW is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (K: $82.77 vs. LW: $52.60)
Brand notoriety: K and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 120% vs. LW: 44%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. LW: $15.38B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both K and LW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.49% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.64% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LW($15.4B). K has higher P/E ratio than LW: K (25.36) vs LW (13.62). K YTD gains are higher at: 2.931 vs. LW (-20.817). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than K: LW (3.63B) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than LW: K (13.1B) vs LW (6.35B).
KLWK / LW
Capitalization19.5B15.4B127%
EBITDA1.76B1.34B131%
Gain YTD2.931-20.817-14%
P/E Ratio25.3613.62186%
Revenue13.1B6.35B206%
Total Cash274MN/A-
Total Debt6.53B3.63B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
K
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1623
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
2642
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
709
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as K (40) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for K (70) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than K’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OST2.770.68
+32.54%
Ostin Technology Group Co Ltd
KE14.330.50
+3.62%
Kimball Electronics
RAMP26.600.89
+3.46%
LiveRamp Holdings
EXEL37.210.43
+1.17%
Exelixis
BBLG0.68N/A
+0.07%
Bone Biologics Corp

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that K and SMPL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that K and SMPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
-0.10%
SMPL - K
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
DAR - K
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
HAIN - K
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.07%
NOMD - K
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
UTZ - K
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.31%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.33%
KHC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More