K
Price
$80.50
Change
+$0.16 (+0.20%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
46 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$62.09
Change
-$0.42 (-0.67%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

K vs LW

Header iconK vs LW Comparison
Open Charts K vs LWBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$80.50
Change+$0.16 (+0.20%)
Volume$5.31M
CapitalizationN/A
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$62.09
Change-$0.42 (-0.67%)
Volume$50.48K
CapitalizationN/A
K vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. LW commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a Hold and LW is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (K: $80.50 vs. LW: $62.09)
Brand notoriety: K and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 259% vs. LW: 257%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. LW: $15.38B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than LW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -21.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.36% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than LW($15.4B). K has higher P/E ratio than LW: K (25.36) vs LW (13.62). K YTD gains are higher at: 48.885 vs. LW (-41.476). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than K: LW (3.63B) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than LW: K (13.1B) vs LW (6.35B).
KLWK / LW
Capitalization19.5B15.4B127%
EBITDA1.76B1.34B131%
Gain YTD48.885-41.476-118%
P/E Ratio25.3613.62186%
Revenue13.1B6.35B206%
Total Cash274MN/A-
Total Debt6.53B3.63B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
K
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
3725
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (32) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (39) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (25) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as K (37) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as K (36) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to K’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBCP35.140.16
+0.46%
Independent Bank Corp
BLD310.281.32
+0.43%
TopBuild Corp
AY21.99N/A
N/A
Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure plc
VOC4.72-0.06
-1.26%
VOC Energy Trust
SINT3.52-0.14
-3.83%
SiNtx Technologies Inc.

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-0.66%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+21.85%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
FLO - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More