Ad is loading...
KALL vs MCHI
KALL vs MCHI Comparison
Open Charts KALL vs MCHI
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$21.00
Change-$1.35 (-6.04%)
Volume$400
Net Assets10.25M
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$49.87
Change-$3.80 (-7.08%)
Volume$1.45K
Net Assets6.29B
KALL vs MCHI Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KALL vs. MCHI commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KALL is a Hold and MCHI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 6.29B vs. KALL (10.3M). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than KALL: MCHI (14.533) vs KALL (8.868). KALL was incepted earlier than MCHI: KALL (10 years) vs MCHI (14 years). KALL (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than MCHI (0.59). MCHI has a higher turnover KALL (4.00) vs KALL (4.00).
| KALL | MCHI | KALL / MCHI | |
| Gain YTD | 8.868 | 14.533 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 10.3M | 6.29B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.59 | 83% |
| Turnover | 4.00 | 15.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 2.11 | 1.99 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHI | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 68% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| TME - KALL | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ATHM - KALL | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| TCOM - KALL | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.74% | ||
More | ||||
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
More | ||||