KDKCF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.01 (+2.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
35.62M
SLVRF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
66.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KDKCF vs SLVRF

Header iconKDKCF vs SLVRF Comparison
Open Charts KDKCF vs SLVRFBanner chart's image
KODIAK COPPER
Price$0.45
Change+$0.01 (+2.27%)
Volume$31.36K
Capitalization35.62M
Silver One Resources
Price$0.24
Change+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Volume$233.95K
Capitalization66.6M
KDKCF vs SLVRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KDKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KDKCF vs. SLVRF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KDKCF is a Hold and SLVRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (KDKCF: $0.45 vs. SLVRF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: KDKCF and SLVRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KDKCF: 82% vs. SLVRF: 68%
Market capitalization -- KDKCF: $35.62M vs. SLVRF: $66.6M
KDKCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $35.62M. SLVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $66.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KDKCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KDKCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KDKCF and SLVRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KDKCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KDKCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLVRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVRF is a better buy in the short-term than KDKCF.

Price Growth

KDKCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.60% price change this week, while SLVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.53% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVRF($66.6M) has a higher market cap than KDKCF($35.6M). SLVRF YTD gains are higher at: 87.525 vs. KDKCF (76.539). KDKCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.83M vs. SLVRF (-3.31M). KDKCF has more cash in the bank: 5.23M vs. SLVRF (2.73M). SLVRF has less debt than KDKCF: SLVRF (0) vs KDKCF (40K). KDKCF (0) and SLVRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KDKCFSLVRFKDKCF / SLVRF
Capitalization35.6M66.6M53%
EBITDA-2.83M-3.31M85%
Gain YTD76.53987.52587%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.23M2.73M192%
Total Debt40K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KDKCF vs SLVRF: Fundamental Ratings
KDKCF
SLVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5357
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
9493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
190

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLVRF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as KDKCF (54). This means that SLVRF’s stock grew similarly to KDKCF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as SLVRF (100). This means that KDKCF’s stock grew similarly to SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVRF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KDKCF (94). This means that SLVRF’s stock grew similarly to KDKCF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SLVRF (54). This means that KDKCF’s stock grew similarly to SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

KDKCF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SLVRF (100). This means that KDKCF’s stock grew similarly to SLVRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KDKCFSLVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KDKCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMMFF0.92N/A
N/A
OMNI BRIDGEWAY LTD.
SVJTY21.90N/A
N/A
Severstal PAO
ITVPY10.92-0.03
-0.27%
ITV Plc.
GLUC0.10N/A
-4.72%
Glucose Health, Inc.
VPTDF0.09-0.01
-6.64%
VentriPoint Diagnostics Ltd.

KDKCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KDKCF and ALVLF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KDKCF and ALVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDKCF
1D Price
Change %
KDKCF100%
+2.19%
ALVLF - KDKCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
SLVRF - KDKCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.45%
SLVTF - KDKCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
KUYAF - KDKCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
SITKF - KDKCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.38%
More

SLVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVRF
1D Price
Change %
SLVRF100%
+8.45%
PAAS - SLVRF
52%
Loosely correlated
+7.89%
ISVLF - SLVRF
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
MAG - SLVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
+5.35%
AG - SLVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
SVM - SLVRF
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
More