KGC
Price
$24.33
Change
+$0.22 (+0.91%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.73B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEM
Price
$117.08
Change
+$1.03 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
127.95B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGC vs NEM

KGC vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 21, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kinross Gold (KGC) vs. Newmont (NEM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both KGC and NEM are major gold producers benefiting from elevated gold prices in recent market activity, with strong free cash flow generation reported in their latest quarterly results.
  • Kinross Gold maintains a robust net cash position and has received a credit rating upgrade, supporting shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks.
  • Newmont demonstrates larger scale with higher production volumes and significant liquidity, enabling substantial capital returns to investors.
  • Relative performance shows both stocks advancing amid sector tailwinds, though KGC has exhibited notable gains in recent weeks compared to broader market benchmarks.
  • Risk factors include cost pressures and operational execution, while growth drivers center on development pipelines for each company.
  • Market sentiment remains constructive for gold miners, with valuation metrics highlighting trade-offs between scale at NEM and balance sheet strength at KGC.

Introduction

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) represent two prominent players in the gold mining sector, offering investors exposure to precious metals amid fluctuating commodity prices and macroeconomic conditions. This comparison examines their business models, recent operational results, and relative positioning to assist traders and long-term investors evaluating gold equities. Portfolio managers, sector specialists, and individual investors seeking diversified exposure to gold producers may find this analysis relevant for assessing momentum, risk profiles, and market dynamics in the current environment.

KGC Overview and Recent Performance

Kinross Gold Corporation engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of gold properties, with operations primarily in the Americas and Africa. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected positive sentiment driven by strong second-quarter results, including attributable free cash flow of approximately $727 million and a record cash balance of $2.7 billion. The company reported a net cash position of $1.9 billion and received an S&P credit rating upgrade to BBB with a stable outlook. Production remains on track for the full-year guidance of about 2.0 million gold equivalent ounces, supported by disciplined cost management and progress on development projects such as Great Bear and Lobo-Marte. These factors have contributed to favorable relative performance within the gold mining sector.

NEM Overview and Recent Performance

Newmont Corporation is the world’s largest gold producer by market capitalization, with a diversified portfolio spanning multiple continents and additional exposure to copper and silver. Recent market activity has highlighted robust operational execution, with second-quarter attributable gold production of 1.3 million ounces and record free cash flow of $2.2 billion. The company remains on track for its full-year guidance of 5.3 million attributable gold ounces, while maintaining substantial liquidity exceeding $13 billion. Shareholder returns have been significant through dividends and share repurchases. These developments have supported steady sentiment, positioning NEM as a stable large-cap option amid broader gold sector advances in recent periods.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing automated trading systems from a platform that offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots capable of trading thousands of different tickers across global markets. Only the most suitable and top-performing bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this trending section, which highlights strategies with strong historical statistics, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker universes, allowing users to explore options suited to various risk tolerances and objectives. Performance data for featured bots often include win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that can exceed typical benchmarks in optimized configurations. For detailed insights into these tools, visit Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Kinross Gold operates as a mid-tier producer with a focused asset base, emphasizing high-grade development opportunities and a leaner cost structure, whereas Newmont benefits from greater scale, geographic diversification, and by-product revenue streams that enhance resilience. In recent momentum, KGC has shown sharper percentage gains tied to its balance sheet improvements and project pipeline, while NEM delivers more consistent large-volume output and broader market liquidity. Risk factors for KGC include higher relative exposure to specific jurisdictions, contrasted with NEM’s larger debt load despite strong cash generation. Sector exposure remains aligned for both, yet sentiment favors KGC for valuation appeal and NEM for stability and capital return capacity in the current gold price environment.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent market activity, balance sheet stability, and relative positioning within the gold sector, Tickeron’s AI models may probabilistically favor KGC in the near term due to its demonstrated free cash flow strength and credit profile enhancements. However, NEM presents compelling attributes in scale and operational breadth that could support outperformance under sustained favorable commodity conditions. This assessment reflects data-driven patterns rather than certainty and should be evaluated alongside individual portfolio considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KGC vs. NEM commentary
Sep 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGC is a Buy and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGC vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
KGC
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4034
SMR RATING
1..100
2838
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9138
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (26) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (78). This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (40). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (28) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (38). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (62). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGC (91). This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGCNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2026
Stock price -- (KGC: $24.11 vs. NEM: $116.05)
Brand notoriety: KGC and NEM are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGC: 121% vs. NEM: 92%
Market capitalization -- KGC: $29.73B vs. NEM: $127.95B
KGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.73B. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $127.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $2.07K to $127.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $13.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than KGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than KGC.

Price Growth

KGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.24% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -9.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-9.97% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

View a ticker or compare two or three
KGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DINO106.19-0.63
-0.59%
HF Sinclair Corp
PTRN16.77-0.25
-1.47%
Pattern Group Inc.
PUSA3.65-0.07
-1.88%
Aureus Greenway Holdings Inc.
ARRY3.83-0.20
-4.96%
Array Technologies
CHNR3.92-0.22
-5.31%
China Natural Resources Inc

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
-3.75%
AEM - KGC
93%
Closely correlated
-5.31%
WPM - KGC
90%
Closely correlated
-5.11%
IAG - KGC
88%
Closely correlated
-5.18%
NEM - KGC
88%
Closely correlated
-4.43%
AU - KGC
87%
Closely correlated
-6.32%
More