KGC
Price
$23.10
Change
-$0.52 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
27.36B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WPM
Price
$109.03
Change
-$4.35 (-3.84%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
49.42B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGC vs WPM

KGC vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kinross Gold (KGC) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Kinross Gold (KGC) delivered strong second-quarter 2026 results, including 492,000 gold-equivalent ounces produced and over $725 million in free cash flow.
  • Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is scheduled to report its second-quarter 2026 earnings on August 6, with analysts forecasting substantial year-over-year growth in revenue and earnings per share.
  • KGC, a senior gold producer, benefits directly from operational execution and cost management in the current gold price environment.
  • WPM operates as a streaming company, providing capital to miners in exchange for future metal production at predetermined prices, resulting in a different risk and margin profile.
  • Both stocks operate in the precious metals sector, with recent market activity influenced by gold prices and sector sentiment over recent weeks.
  • Relative performance reflects contrasts in business models, with KGC showing recent momentum from earnings delivery while WPM awaits its quarterly update.

Introduction

Kinross Gold (KGC) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) represent two distinct approaches within the precious metals industry, making them relevant for comparison by investors and traders focused on gold exposure. KGC is a traditional mining operator with producing assets, while WPM provides streaming and royalty financing to mining companies. This stock comparison highlights differences in business models, recent performance drivers, and market positioning. Sector participants, including those monitoring gold prices and company-specific catalysts, may find the analysis useful for understanding relative strengths in the current environment.

KGC Overview and Recent Performance

Kinross Gold (KGC) is a senior gold producer with operations across the Americas and other regions. In recent weeks, the company reported strong second-quarter 2026 results, with attributable production of 492,000 gold-equivalent ounces and free cash flow exceeding $725 million. Disciplined cost management supported robust margins, and the firm returned a significant portion of cash flow to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. These results contributed to positive sentiment around operational execution. The stock has traded in line with broader precious metals market activity, influenced by gold price movements and company-specific developments such as project updates.

WPM Overview and Recent Performance

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is a leading streaming company that provides upfront capital to mining partners in exchange for the right to purchase future precious metal production at fixed prices. The company is set to release its second-quarter 2026 results on August 6. Analysts anticipate notable year-over-year increases in revenue and earnings per share, building on record first-quarter performance. Over recent weeks, market focus has centered on upcoming earnings and the company’s positioning within the sector. Stock behavior has reflected general precious metals sentiment alongside expectations for continued growth in its diversified streaming portfolio.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across various styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and ticker sets. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for current conditions appear in the Trending AI Robots section, which features bots with diverse metrics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges to appeal to different trading preferences. This resource allows users to explore automated strategies tailored to stocks like those in the precious metals sector. Visit Trending AI Robots to review available options.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Kinross Gold (KGC) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) differ fundamentally in business models: KGC engages in direct mining and production with exposure to operational costs and execution risks, while WPM’s streaming model offers lower capital intensity and more predictable margins through long-term contracts. Growth drivers for KGC center on production volumes, cost control, and project development, whereas WPM benefits from portfolio expansion and partner mine performance. Recent momentum has favored KGC following its earnings release, while WPM’s positioning hinges on the upcoming quarterly report. Risk factors include commodity price volatility for both, with KGC facing additional operational and regulatory considerations and WPM exposed to partner delivery risks. Sector exposure remains similar in precious metals, though market sentiment has varied with individual catalysts over recent weeks.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, free cash flow generation, and relative positioning within the precious metals sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term momentum to Kinross Gold (KGC) compared with Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM). This assessment reflects KGC’s delivered results amid stable trend characteristics, while acknowledging that WPM’s upcoming earnings could influence relative positioning. The view remains probabilistic and tied to continuing market conditions rather than a definitive outlook.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KGC vs. WPM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGC is a Hold and WPM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (KGC: $23.10 vs. WPM: $109.03)
Brand notoriety: KGC and WPM are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGC: 63% vs. WPM: 82%
Market capitalization -- KGC: $27.36B vs. WPM: $49.42B
KGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.36B. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $49.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $9.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KGC and WPM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the short-term than WPM.

Price Growth

KGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WPM($49.4B) has a higher market cap than KGC($27.4B). WPM has higher P/E ratio than KGC: WPM (27.55) vs KGC (8.78). WPM YTD gains are higher at: -6.939 vs. KGC (-17.754). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.6B vs. WPM (2.4B). KGC has more cash in the bank: 2.66B vs. WPM (2.17B). WPM has less debt than KGC: WPM (7.66M) vs KGC (739M). KGC has higher revenues than WPM: KGC (8.47B) vs WPM (2.75B).
KGCWPMKGC / WPM
Capitalization27.4B49.4B55%
EBITDA5.6B2.4B234%
Gain YTD-17.754-6.939256%
P/E Ratio8.7827.5532%
Revenue8.47B2.75B308%
Total Cash2.66B2.17B123%
Total Debt739M7.66M9,645%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGC vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
KGC
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1112
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4445
SMR RATING
1..100
2744
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (28) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (37). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (45). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (44). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (60). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (97). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGCWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEPS2.950.03
+1.03%
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
CAKE101.420.11
+0.11%
Cheesecake Factory
KLTR1.37N/A
N/A
Kaltura
NKE41.71-0.58
-1.37%
Nike
BFRI1.17-0.06
-4.88%
Biofrontera

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
-2.20%
AEM - KGC
93%
Closely correlated
-3.64%
WPM - KGC
90%
Closely correlated
-3.84%
NEM - KGC
88%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
IAG - KGC
88%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
AU - KGC
88%
Closely correlated
-3.66%
More