KGHPF
Price
$35.00
Change
+$0.99 (+2.91%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.2B
LMSQF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.02 (-11.76%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGHPF vs LMSQF

Header iconKGHPF vs LMSQF Comparison
Open Charts KGHPF vs LMSQFBanner chart's image
KGHM Polska Miedz S.A
Price$35.00
Change+$0.99 (+2.91%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.2B
Latin Metals
Price$0.15
Change-$0.02 (-11.76%)
Volume$14.1K
Capitalization6.74M
KGHPF vs LMSQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGHPF vs. LMSQF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGHPF is a Buy and LMSQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (KGHPF: $35.00 vs. LMSQF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: KGHPF and LMSQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGHPF: 49% vs. LMSQF: 47%
Market capitalization -- KGHPF: $6.2B vs. LMSQF: $6.74M
KGHPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.2B. LMSQF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMSQF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMSQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGHPF is a better buy in the long-term than LMSQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGHPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMSQF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGHPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LMSQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KGHPF and LMSQF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KGHPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMSQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGHPF($6.2B) has a higher market cap than LMSQF($6.74M). LMSQF has higher P/E ratio than KGHPF: LMSQF (16.53) vs KGHPF (7.67). LMSQF YTD gains are higher at: 142.921 vs. KGHPF (10.759). KGHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.93B vs. LMSQF (-892.32K). KGHPF has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. LMSQF (546K). LMSQF has less debt than KGHPF: LMSQF (65.8K) vs KGHPF (6.52B). KGHPF has higher revenues than LMSQF: KGHPF (34.4B) vs LMSQF (0).
KGHPFLMSQFKGHPF / LMSQF
Capitalization6.2B6.74M91,914%
EBITDA6.93B-892.32K-776,962%
Gain YTD10.759142.9218%
P/E Ratio7.6716.5346%
Revenue34.4B0-
Total Cash1.95B546K356,593%
Total Debt6.52B65.8K9,904,255%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGHPF vs LMSQF: Fundamental Ratings
KGHPF
LMSQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5961
SMR RATING
1..100
7196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
36n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGHPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMSQF (66). This means that KGHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

KGHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as LMSQF (61). This means that KGHPF’s stock grew similarly to LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

KGHPF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as LMSQF (96). This means that KGHPF’s stock grew similarly to LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

LMSQF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as KGHPF (50). This means that LMSQF’s stock grew similarly to KGHPF’s over the last 12 months.

KGHPF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LMSQF (82). This means that KGHPF’s stock grew similarly to LMSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGHPFLMSQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QVCGA3.060.07
+2.34%
QVC Group Inc
FNB15.580.25
+1.63%
FNB Corp
CIVB25.080.30
+1.21%
Civista Bancshares
TT437.394.68
+1.08%
Trane Technologies plc
HY42.540.27
+0.64%
Hyster-Yale Inc.

KGHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGHPF and JNOMF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGHPF and JNOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGHPF
1D Price
Change %
KGHPF100%
N/A
JNOMF - KGHPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMHLF - KGHPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NICLF - KGHPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-26.01%
KEWL - KGHPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMSQF - KGHPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LMSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMSQF and LYSCF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMSQF and LYSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMSQF
1D Price
Change %
LMSQF100%
N/A
LYSCF - LMSQF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
KVLQF - LMSQF
13%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
LEMIF - LMSQF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
BHSIF - LMSQF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
KGHPF - LMSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More