KGTHY
Price
$8.48
Change
+$1.08 (+14.59%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.54B
MAMTF
Price
$14.81
Change
-$0.24 (-1.59%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
423.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGTHY vs MAMTF

Header iconKGTHY vs MAMTF Comparison
Open Charts KGTHY vs MAMTFBanner chart's image
Krungthai Card Public
Price$8.48
Change+$1.08 (+14.59%)
Volume$468
Capitalization3.54B
Mcan Mortgage
Price$14.81
Change-$0.24 (-1.59%)
Volume$147
Capitalization423.26M
KGTHY vs MAMTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGTHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGTHY vs. MAMTF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGTHY is a StrongBuy and MAMTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (KGTHY: $8.48 vs. MAMTF: $14.81)
Brand notoriety: KGTHY and MAMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGTHY: 44% vs. MAMTF: 25%
Market capitalization -- KGTHY: $3.54B vs. MAMTF: $423.26M
KGTHY [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $3.54B. MAMTF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $423.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGTHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KGTHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAMTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMTF is a better buy in the long-term than KGTHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGTHY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGTHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MAMTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGTHY is a better buy in the short-term than MAMTF.

Price Growth

KGTHY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +14.59% price change this week, while MAMTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.96% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGTHY($3.54B) has a higher market cap than MAMTF($423M). KGTHY has higher P/E ratio than MAMTF: KGTHY (16.69) vs MAMTF (8.47). MAMTF YTD gains are higher at: 9.623 vs. KGTHY (-29.575). MAMTF has less debt than KGTHY: MAMTF (31.8M) vs KGTHY (59.5B). KGTHY has higher revenues than MAMTF: KGTHY (19.1B) vs MAMTF (101M).
KGTHYMAMTFKGTHY / MAMTF
Capitalization3.54B423M836%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-29.5759.623-307%
P/E Ratio16.698.47197%
Revenue19.1B101M18,911%
Total CashN/A816M-
Total Debt59.5B31.8M187,107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGTHY vs MAMTF: Fundamental Ratings
KGTHY
MAMTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1197
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAMTF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as KGTHY (31). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to KGTHY’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGTHY (100). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGTHY’s over the last 12 months.

KGTHY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMTF (42). This means that KGTHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMTF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGTHY (93). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGTHY’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGTHY (87). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew significantly faster than KGTHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGTHYMAMTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
21%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGTHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYSAX411.44N/A
N/A
Rydex Electronics H
TORTX19.05N/A
N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR A
MLVPX19.57N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity R3
PALRX18.48N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced R
OIEFX24.48N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Income R2

KGTHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGTHY and FNMA have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGTHY and FNMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGTHY
1D Price
Change %
KGTHY100%
+14.59%
FNMA - KGTHY
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
FMCC - KGTHY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
LZRFY - KGTHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FNLIF - KGTHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMTF - KGTHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMTF and ZIZTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMTF and ZIZTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMTF
1D Price
Change %
MAMTF100%
N/A
ZIZTF - MAMTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTHY - MAMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+14.59%
FNLIF - MAMTF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDCHF - MAMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LZRFY - MAMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
More