Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KINAX vs LSHCX
KINAX vs LSHCX Comparison
Open Charts KINAX vs LSHCX
Kinetics Internet Adv A
Price$103.58
Change+$1.83 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets357.2M
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$25.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.24M
KINAX vs LSHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KINAX vs. LSHCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KINAX is a StrongBuy and LSHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KINAX has more cash in the bank: 357M vs. LSHCX (31.2M). LSHCX pays higher dividends than KINAX: LSHCX (0.26) vs KINAX (0.21). KINAX was incepted earlier than LSHCX: KINAX (24 years) vs LSHCX (18 years). LSHCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than KINAX (1.96). KINAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. LSHCX (6.00). KINAX (2500) and LSHCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. KINAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.55 vs. LSHCX (8.59). KINAX return over 5 years is better than : 223.94 vs. LSHCX (178.56).
| KINAX | LSHCX | KINAX / LSHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.29 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.56 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.143 | -10.360 | -98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357M | 31.2M | 1,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.26 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.55 | 8.59 | 449% |
| Returns for 3 years | 145.78 | 39.38 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 223.94 | 178.56 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.10 | 164.41 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement