Ad is loading...
KLCAX vs RGACX
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGACX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$14.42
Change-$0.53 (-3.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$63.87
Change-$2.62 (-3.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. KLCAX (1.12B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGACX (0.09) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLCAX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.56 vs. KLCAX (-24.80). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 48.46 vs. KLCAX (-40.10).
| KLCAX | RGACX | KLCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.008 | -7.640 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 272B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.80 | -2.56 | 969% |
| Returns for 3 years | -47.00 | 8.00 | -587% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.10 | 48.46 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.72 | 51.25 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...