Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGACX
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGACX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$17.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.30
Change+$0.33 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.72B
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. KLCAX (1.25B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGACX (23 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. KLCAX (-17.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.38 vs. KLCAX (-42.69).
| KLCAX | RGACX | KLCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.764 | 11.543 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.38 | 8.69 | -200% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.88 | 57.35 | -45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.69 | 43.38 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.43 | 77.95 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement