Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGACX
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGACX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$17.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.11
Change-$0.25 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. KLCAX (1.23B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGACX (0.08) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLCAX (18 years) vs RGACX (23 years). KLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. KLCAX (-16.63). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.96 vs. KLCAX (-42.13).
| KLCAX | RGACX | KLCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.078 | 4.681 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 305B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.63 | 8.05 | -207% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.78 | 36.40 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.13 | 41.96 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.76 | 70.88 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement