Ad is loading...
KLCAX vs RGACX
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGACX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap A
Price$16.72
Change+$0.15 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$73.42
Change+$0.65 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
KLCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. KLCAX (1.43B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGACX (0.25) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLCAX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. KLCAX (19.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGACX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.33 vs. KLCAX (-8.33). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.87 vs. KLCAX (-39.77).
| KLCAX | RGACX | KLCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.081 | 18.919 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 301B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.33 | 19.33 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -49.99 | 3.23 | -1,547% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.77 | 45.87 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.64 | 73.03 | -15% |