KMMPF
Price
$13.85
Change
-$0.06 (-0.43%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
TUERF
Price
$7.06
Change
+$0.34 (+5.06%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
182.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMMPF vs TUERF

Header iconKMMPF vs TUERF Comparison
Open Charts KMMPF vs TUERFBanner chart's image
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr
Price$13.85
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
Volume$55.61K
Capitalization1.62B
TRUE NORTH COMMERICAL
Price$7.06
Change+$0.34 (+5.06%)
Volume$517
Capitalization182.08M
KMMPF vs TUERF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KMMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TUERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMMPF vs. TUERF commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMMPF is a Hold and TUERF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (KMMPF: $13.85 vs. TUERF: $7.06)
Brand notoriety: KMMPF and TUERF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMMPF: 102% vs. TUERF: 73%
Market capitalization -- KMMPF: $1.62B vs. TUERF: $182.08M
KMMPF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.62B. TUERF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $182.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMMPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTUERF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMMPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TUERF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TUERF is a better buy in the long-term than KMMPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMMPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUERF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMMPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TUERF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TUERF is a better buy in the short-term than KMMPF.

Price Growth

KMMPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TUERF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.82% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMMPF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than TUERF($182M). TUERF has higher P/E ratio than KMMPF: TUERF (29.76) vs KMMPF (8.27). KMMPF YTD gains are higher at: 17.923 vs. TUERF (2.691). KMMPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 366M vs. TUERF (38.4M). KMMPF has more cash in the bank: 14.1M vs. TUERF (7.79M). TUERF has less debt than KMMPF: TUERF (861M) vs KMMPF (2.19B). KMMPF has higher revenues than TUERF: KMMPF (348M) vs TUERF (141M).
KMMPFTUERFKMMPF / TUERF
Capitalization1.62B182M889%
EBITDA366M38.4M953%
Gain YTD17.9232.691666%
P/E Ratio8.2729.7628%
Revenue348M141M247%
Total Cash14.1M7.79M181%
Total Debt2.19B861M254%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMMPF vs TUERF: Fundamental Ratings
KMMPF
TUERF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
4191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
934
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TUERF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (58). This means that TUERF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

KMMPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as TUERF (100). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew similarly to TUERF’s over the last 12 months.

KMMPF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUERF (91). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUERF’s over the last 12 months.

TUERF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (50). This means that TUERF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

TUERF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMMPF (93). This means that TUERF’s stock grew significantly faster than KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMMPFTUERF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TUERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DREYX41.610.12
+0.29%
Davis Real Estate Y
PGSVX13.43N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Global Value A
FIQCX28.95-0.03
-0.10%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Z
FAERX38.03-0.09
-0.24%
Fidelity Advisor Overseas M
PJHRX29.45-0.23
-0.77%
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences R

KMMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMMPF and CROMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMMPF and CROMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMMPF
1D Price
Change %
KMMPF100%
N/A
CROMF - KMMPF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
PEB - KMMPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
CPT - KMMPF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
BSRTF - KMMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
FR - KMMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

TUERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUERF has been loosely correlated with FRMUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUERF jumps, then FRMUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUERF
1D Price
Change %
TUERF100%
N/A
FRMUF - TUERF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
KMMPF - TUERF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURVF - TUERF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SGLMF - TUERF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLTTF - TUERF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More