Advertisement
KMT vs PH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kennametal (KMT) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Kennametal (KMT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) operate in the industrials sector, with KMT focused on metal cutting and infrastructure tools while PH specializes in motion and control technologies across diversified industrial and aerospace markets.
- Over recent weeks, KMT has delivered stronger year-to-date returns compared to PH, though both stocks have shown resilience amid broader market conditions.
- Both companies face upcoming quarterly earnings reports in early August 2026, with KMT reporting on August 5 and PH on August 6, providing key catalysts for near-term price movement.
- KMT trades at a lower valuation multiple with a higher dividend yield, while PH offers greater scale, higher profitability margins, and stronger long-term growth in aerospace and industrial applications.
- Sector exposure differences highlight trade-offs: KMT's smaller market capitalization introduces higher volatility potential, whereas PH's larger size supports more stable positioning in high-growth areas like aerospace systems.
- Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism for both, influenced by industrial demand trends and macroeconomic factors affecting capital equipment spending.
Introduction
This comparison examines Kennametal (KMT) and Parker-Hannifin (PH), two established players in the industrials sector. The analysis focuses on their business models, recent stock performance, and positioning in the current market environment. Investors and traders interested in industrial stocks, relative valuation, and momentum within the tools and machinery space may find this overview relevant for assessing diversification opportunities or sector allocation decisions.
KMT Overview and Recent Performance
Kennametal (KMT) develops and applies tungsten carbides, ceramics, and hard materials for metal cutting and infrastructure applications worldwide. The company serves industries including aerospace, automotive, and energy through its Metal Cutting and Infrastructure segments. In recent market activity, KMT has posted notable gains, with year-to-date returns exceeding 20% as of late July 2026. Recent weeks have seen positive sentiment supported by strong fiscal third-quarter results, including double-digit organic sales growth. Upcoming fourth-quarter earnings on August 5, 2026, represent a key near-term catalyst, with analysts monitoring demand trends in industrial end markets.
PH Overview and Recent Performance
Parker-Hannifin (PH) manufactures motion and control technologies and systems for aerospace and defense, industrial equipment, transportation, and energy markets. It operates through Diversified Industrial and Aerospace Systems segments, delivering components such as pumps, valves, and sealing solutions. In recent market activity, PH has recorded year-to-date returns around 11.5% as of late July 2026, supported by steady demand in aerospace and industrial sectors. The company is scheduled to report fiscal fourth-quarter results on August 6, 2026, with focus on earnings growth and margin trends amid ongoing operational execution.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a broader pool of hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only the most suitable and effective ones earn placement in the curated trending section based on performance metrics and adaptability. Available bots exhibit diverse statistics, including ranges in win rates, profit factors, and drawdown levels, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific trading styles. All AI trading bots feature unique combinations of strategies, performance histories, and ticker sets. For further details, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, Kennametal (KMT) emphasizes specialized cutting tools and wear-resistant materials, creating exposure to cyclical industrial and mining demand, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) provides broader motion-control solutions with significant aerospace and defense revenue streams that offer more defensive characteristics. Recent momentum favors KMT with higher year-to-date gains, though PH demonstrates superior long-term compounded returns and larger scale with a market capitalization exceeding $123 billion versus KMT’s approximately $2.6 billion. Risk factors differ notably: KMT’s smaller size and higher beta suggest greater sensitivity to economic swings, whereas PH’s established dividend growth history and higher profitability margins provide relative stability. Sector exposure places both in industrials, but PH benefits from stronger positioning in high-growth aerospace applications, creating a trade-off between KMT’s potential for sharper rebounds and PH’s more consistent cash flow generation. Market sentiment remains balanced, with both stocks influenced by capital spending trends and supply chain dynamics.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative market positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently lean toward Parker-Hannifin (PH) with moderate probability. PH’s larger scale, established aerospace exposure, and history of earnings resilience provide a more stable profile amid ongoing industrial sector variability. Kennametal (KMT) shows attractive recent momentum and valuation appeal but carries higher volatility typical of smaller-capitalization names. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of current data rather than definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMT is a StrongBuy and PH is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- KMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KMT (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а -9.68% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.69%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
KMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
PH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (-1.17% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Industrial Machinery (+1.16% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| KMT | PH | KMT / PH | |
| Capitalization | 2.32B | 134B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 360M | 5.63B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 8.733 | 20.966 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.87 | 37.18 | 18% |
| Revenue | 2.14B | 21B | 10% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 476M | - |
| Total Debt | 660M | 9.58B | 7% |
KMT | PH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 16 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMT's Valuation (5) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for PH (80). This means that KMT’s stock grew significantly faster than PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMT (94). This means that PH’s stock grew significantly faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as KMT (70). This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to KMT’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (60). This means that PH’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
PH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMT (97). This means that PH’s stock grew significantly faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
| KMT | PH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 26 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 69% |
Advertisement
KMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMT has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMT jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| HLIO - KMT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| MIDD - KMT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| TNC - KMT | 68% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| SXI - KMT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| WTS - KMT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||