Advertisement
KO vs PAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KO is a Hold and PAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while PAM (@Electric Utilities) price change was -3.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
KO is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
PAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-0.54% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Electric Utilities (-0.06% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| KO | PAM | KO / PAM | |
| Capitalization | 264B | 3B | 8,794% |
| EBITDA | 15.6B | 354B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | 12.779 | -16.761 | -76% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.57 | 12.73 | 193% |
| Revenue | 45.8B | 501B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 13.7B | 337B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 42.1B | 579B | 7% |
KO | PAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KO's Valuation (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAM (76) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAM’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PAM (20) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to PAM’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (23) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PAM (41) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to PAM’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PAM (59) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to PAM’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as KO (37) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
| KO | PAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 15 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
PAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAM has been closely correlated with CEPU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAM jumps, then CEPU could also see price increases.