KOSS
Price
$7.55
Change
-$0.07 (-0.92%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:20 PM (EDT)
36 days until earnings call
XIACF
Price
$3.89
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

KOSS vs XIACF

Header iconKOSS vs XIACF Comparison
Open Charts KOSS vs XIACFBanner chart's image
Koss
Price$7.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.92%)
Volume$417
CapitalizationN/A
Xiaomi
Price$3.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$49.41K
CapitalizationN/A
KOSS vs XIACF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KOSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XIACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KOSS vs. XIACF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KOSS is a Hold and XIACF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (KOSS: $7.62 vs. XIACF: $3.89)
Brand notoriety: KOSS and XIACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KOSS: 88% vs. XIACF: 93%
Market capitalization -- KOSS: $23.78M vs. XIACF: $39.44B
KOSS [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $23.78M. XIACF’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $39.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $2.62T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $82.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KOSS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXIACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KOSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XIACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XIACF is a better buy in the long-term than KOSS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KOSS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XIACF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KOSS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XIACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KOSS is a better buy in the short-term than XIACF.

Price Growth

KOSS (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а +5.54% price change this week, while XIACF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

KOSS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (-0.73% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XIACF($39.4B) has a higher market cap than KOSS($23.8M). XIACF has higher P/E ratio than KOSS: XIACF (37.45) vs KOSS (3.20). KOSS YTD gains are higher at: 127.463 vs. XIACF (92.574). XIACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.76B vs. KOSS (-1.83M). XIACF has more cash in the bank: 71.2B vs. KOSS (14.6M). KOSS has less debt than XIACF: KOSS (2.9M) vs XIACF (22.5B). XIACF has higher revenues than KOSS: XIACF (266B) vs KOSS (13.2M).
KOSSXIACFKOSS / XIACF
Capitalization23.8M39.4B0%
EBITDA-1.83M8.76B-0%
Gain YTD127.46392.574138%
P/E Ratio3.2037.459%
Revenue13.2M266B0%
Total Cash14.6M71.2B0%
Total Debt2.9M22.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KOSS vs XIACF: Fundamental Ratings
KOSS
XIACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8642
SMR RATING
1..100
9082
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KOSS's Valuation (77) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry is in the same range as XIACF (81) in the null industry. This means that KOSS’s stock grew similarly to XIACF’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KOSS (86) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KOSS’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as KOSS (90) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew similarly to KOSS’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as KOSS (37) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew similarly to KOSS’s over the last 12 months.

XIACF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KOSS (100) in the Electronics Or Appliances industry. This means that XIACF’s stock grew significantly faster than KOSS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KOSSXIACF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KOSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XIACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPXU21.260.29
+1.38%
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
JHPI22.980.08
+0.37%
JHancock Preferred Income ETF
XDAT27.21N/A
N/A
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
OCTT38.82-0.05
-0.13%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF
COPX39.76-0.47
-1.17%
Global X Copper Miners ETF

KOSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KOSS and GPRO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KOSS and GPRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KOSS
1D Price
Change %
KOSS100%
+2.28%
GPRO - KOSS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
LPL - KOSS
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
SONO - KOSS
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
AAPL - KOSS
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
XIACF - KOSS
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

XIACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIACF has been closely correlated with XIACY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XIACF jumps, then XIACY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XIACF
1D Price
Change %
XIACF100%
+0.10%
XIACY - XIACF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
LPL - XIACF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
GPRO - XIACF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
ZEPP - XIACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
UEIC - XIACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More