Ad is loading...
KTCAX vs SLMCX
KTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCAX vs SLMCX
DWS Science and Technology A
Price$35.08
Change+$0.23 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$110.32
Change+$0.99 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.29B
KTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCAX vs. SLMCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCAX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. KTCAX (1.61B). KTCAX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCAX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCAX (77 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). SLMCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than KTCAX (0.90). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. KTCAX (27.00). KTCAX (6%) and SLMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. KTCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: KTCAX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). KTCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.23 vs. SLMCX (-9.60). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.05 vs. KTCAX (68.85).
| KTCAX | SLMCX | KTCAX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.18 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.18 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.278 | -12.121 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 12.3B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.23 | -9.60 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.80 | -5.38 | -164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.85 | 79.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.50 | 89.15 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers