Ad is loading...
KTCSX vs SLMCX
KTCSX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCSX vs SLMCX
DWS Science and Technology S
Price$34.37
Change-$1.58 (-4.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$100.22
Change-$5.60 (-5.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.86B
KTCSX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCSX vs. SLMCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCSX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. KTCSX (1.59B). KTCSX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCSX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCSX (20 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). SLMCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than KTCSX (0.72). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. KTCSX (27.00). SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTCSX: SLMCX (2000) vs KTCSX (2500). KTCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.31 vs. SLMCX (-11.96). KTCSX (54.82) and SLMCX (54.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| KTCSX | SLMCX | KTCSX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.18 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.18 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.103 | -14.943 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 11.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.31 | -11.96 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.06 | -2.28 | -748% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.82 | 54.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.47 | 79.30 | 129% |