KTEC
Price
$13.16
Change
+$0.07 (+0.53%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
57.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KWEB
Price
$26.66
Change
-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
5.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KTEC vs KWEB

KTEC vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) vs. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

Key Takeaways

  • KTEC tracks the Hang Seng TECH Index, concentrating on the 30 largest Hong Kong-listed technology companies, while KWEB follows the CSI China Internet Index, targeting approximately 30-34 Chinese internet and e-commerce firms.
  • Both ETFs share an identical expense ratio of 0.69% and employ passive, market-cap-weighted indexing strategies with similar numbers of holdings.
  • Sector allocations differ notably: KTEC emphasizes Technology Services and Electronic Technology, whereas KWEB allocates more heavily to Technology Services and Retail Trade.
  • Top holdings overlap in names such as Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Meituan but reflect distinct index emphases, with KTEC including hardware-oriented names like Lenovo Group Ltd. and KWEB focusing on pure internet plays.
  • Structural similarities position both as cost-efficient vehicles for China technology exposure, though KWEB offers a longer track record since 2013 compared with KTEC's 2021 inception.
  • Relative positioning hinges on thematic preferences: KTEC for broader Hong Kong tech diversification versus KWEB for concentrated internet-sector momentum.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to China's technology and internet sectors often evaluate KTEC and KWEB as complementary or alternative options within the same broader theme. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but provide differentiated access to overlapping yet distinct segments of the Chinese equity market. KTEC offers concentrated Hong Kong-listed technology exposure, while KWEB delivers focused coverage of mainland internet companies. Comparing their structures, holdings, and thematic tilts helps clarify which vehicle may better align with specific risk tolerances and sector views in the current environment.

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) Overview

KTEC is a passive ETF that seeks to track the performance of the Hang Seng TECH Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 30 securities, providing market-cap-weighted exposure to the largest technology companies listed in Hong Kong. Top holdings typically include Meituan, Tencent Holdings Ltd., BYD Co Ltd., Xiaomi Corp., and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Sector allocations center on Technology Services and Electronic Technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.69%. As a straightforward index-tracking product from KraneShares, KTEC features standard rebalancing aligned with its underlying index and offers liquidity typical of established thematic ETFs.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Overview

KWEB is a passive ETF designed to track the CSI China Internet Index before fees and expenses. The fund maintains roughly 30-34 holdings, delivering market-cap-weighted exposure to leading Chinese internet and related companies. Prominent positions often feature Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., PDD Holdings Inc., and Meituan. Sector breakdowns show significant weight in Technology Services and Retail Trade. The expense ratio is 0.69%. Launched in 2013, KWEB employs standard passive index methodology with periodic rebalancing and benefits from established trading volume.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within China's dynamic technology and internet ecosystem, influenced by regulatory developments, macroeconomic conditions, and global capital flows. Key factors include evolving data-security and antitrust policies, shifts in consumer spending patterns, and broader interest-rate expectations that affect growth-oriented equities. Geopolitical tensions and domestic stimulus measures also shape sector sentiment. Risks encompass concentration in a limited number of large-cap names, currency fluctuations, and potential volatility from policy announcements. These elements create an environment where relative positioning between hardware-tilted technology exposure and pure internet plays can influence long-term outcomes across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to China-specific catalysts such as earnings reports from dominant holdings and shifts in regulatory tone. KTEC's inclusion of electronic hardware names may introduce different volatility patterns compared with KWEB's heavier e-commerce orientation. Relative performance has often reflected sector rotation between consumer internet platforms and broader technology supply chains. During periods of improving risk appetite, both have participated in rebounds, though differences in holdings can lead to divergence in shorter windows. Liquidity profiles support efficient trading for both, with structural characteristics favoring investors who prioritize thematic consistency over short-term timing.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to KWEB. Its longer operating history, comparable cost structure, and concentrated alignment with high-momentum internet subsectors support greater consistency in trend capture and sector exposure. KTEC remains competitive for investors prioritizing Hong Kong-listed diversification, yet the broader thematic fit and established positioning of KWEB tilt the balance under prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KTEC vs. KWEB commentary
Aug 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTEC is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.3B vs. KTEC (57.7M). KTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: KTEC (-15.964) vs KWEB (-21.703). KTEC was incepted earlier than KWEB: KTEC (5 years) vs KWEB (13 years). KTEC (0.69) and KWEB (0.70) have comparable expense ratios . KTEC has a higher turnover KWEB (45.00) vs KWEB (45.00).
KTECKWEBKTEC / KWEB
Gain YTD-15.964-21.70374%
Net Assets57.7M5.3B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.690.7099%
Turnover71.0045.00158%
Yield3.877.4352%
Fund Existence5 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KTECKWEB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KWEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAML40.470.26
+0.65%
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
ETG23.990.11
+0.46%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
HYBX29.650.01
+0.05%
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
EMP19.79-0.01
-0.05%
Entergy Mississippi LLC
LVIG98.10-0.11
-0.11%
Longview Advantage Fixed Income ETF

KWEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWEB
1D Price
Change %
KWEB100%
-0.11%
BABA - KWEB
89%
Closely correlated
-8.57%
JD - KWEB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
BILI - KWEB
82%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
BIDU - KWEB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
KC - KWEB
79%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
More