KVAC
Price
$11.39
Change
+$0.06 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
202.38M
MANDF
Price
$6.38
Change
+$0.75 (+13.32%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KVAC vs MANDF

Header iconKVAC vs MANDF Comparison
Open Charts KVAC vs MANDFBanner chart's image
Keen Vision Acquisition
Price$11.39
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
Volume$292
Capitalization202.38M
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$6.38
Change+$0.75 (+13.32%)
Volume$700
Capitalization3.36B
KVAC vs MANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KVAC vs. MANDF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KVAC is a Hold and MANDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (KVAC: $11.39 vs. MANDF: $6.38)
Brand notoriety: KVAC and MANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KVAC: 4% vs. MANDF: 90%
Market capitalization -- KVAC: $202.38M vs. MANDF: $3.36B
KVAC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $202.38M. MANDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $3.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KVAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMANDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KVAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than KVAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MANDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MANDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

KVAC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +13.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

KVAC is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF($3.36B) has a higher market cap than KVAC($202M). KVAC has higher P/E ratio than MANDF: KVAC (41.88) vs MANDF (15.44). MANDF YTD gains are higher at: 41.778 vs. KVAC (3.734). MANDF has more cash in the bank: 830M vs. KVAC (632K). KVAC has less debt than MANDF: KVAC (279K) vs MANDF (600M). MANDF has higher revenues than KVAC: MANDF (893M) vs KVAC (0).
KVACMANDFKVAC / MANDF
Capitalization202M3.36B6%
EBITDA-478.68KN/A-
Gain YTD3.73441.7789%
P/E Ratio41.8815.44271%
Revenue0893M-
Total Cash632K830M0%
Total Debt279K600M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KVACMANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSCDF5.750.50
+9.54%
Tesco PLC
OCDDY6.720.14
+2.19%
Ocado Group PLC
MRLWF6.01N/A
N/A
Marlowe PLC
MWCAF0.17N/A
N/A
Matachewan Consolidated Mines Ltd.
ESTTF5682155.00N/A
N/A
Estore Corp.

KVAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KVAC and HLXB have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KVAC and HLXB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KVAC
1D Price
Change %
KVAC100%
+0.53%
HLXB - KVAC
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKL - KVAC
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
JVSAU - KVAC
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - KVAC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
RTGC - KVAC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MANDF and NETD have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANDF and NETD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
NETD - MANDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
BOWN - MANDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
KVAC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
RTGC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSTUF - MANDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More