KWR
Price
$184.35
Change
+$5.46 (+3.05%)
Updated
Dec 1, 6:59 PM EST
81 days until earnings call
LTHM
Price
$14.32
Change
+$0.55 (+3.99%)
Updated
Dec 1, 6:59 PM EST
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions KWR vs LTHM

Header iconKWR vs LTHM Comparison
Open Charts KWR vs LTHMBanner chart's image
Quaker Houghton
Price$184.35
Change+$5.46 (+3.05%)
Volume$10.73K
CapitalizationN/A
Livent
Price$14.32
Change+$0.55 (+3.99%)
Volume$1.48M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
KWR vs LTHM Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
KWR vs. LTHM commentary
Dec 04, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWR is a Hold and LTHM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2023
Stock price -- (KWR: $184.04 vs. LTHM: $14.32)
Brand notoriety: KWR: Not notable vs. LTHM: Notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KWR: 104% vs. LTHM: 100%
Market capitalization -- KWR: $3.17B vs. LTHM: $2.39B
KWR [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.17B. LTHM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $200.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KWR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTHM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LTHM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KWR is a better buy in the long-term than LTHM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KWR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTHM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LTHM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LTHM is a better buy in the short-term than KWR.

Price Growth

KWR (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +4.30% price change this week, while LTHM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

KWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 22, 2024.

LTHM is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.61% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for KWR with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LTHM with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWR($3.17B) has a higher market cap than LTHM($2.39B). KWR has higher P/E ratio than LTHM: KWR (196.08) vs LTHM (7.52). KWR YTD gains are higher at: 11.361 vs. LTHM (-27.932). LTHM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 502M vs. KWR (183M). KWR has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. LTHM (113M). LTHM has less debt than KWR: LTHM (250M) vs KWR (846M). KWR has higher revenues than LTHM: KWR (1.97B) vs LTHM (920M).
KWRLTHMKWR / LTHM
Capitalization3.17B2.39B133%
EBITDA183M502M36%
Gain YTD11.361-27.932-41%
P/E Ratio196.087.522,606%
Revenue1.97B920M214%
Total Cash198M113M175%
Total Debt846M250M338%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KWR: Fundamental Ratings
KWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KWRLTHM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCVFX30.950.73
+2.42%
Fidelity Advisor® Value C
JVSNX13.730.30
+2.23%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value N
HMVUX16.380.32
+1.99%
Hartford MidCap Value R6
FAGKX54.690.75
+1.39%
Fidelity® Growth Strategies K
CEUFX53.500.46
+0.87%
American Funds Europacific Growth 529F1

KWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWR has been loosely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KWR jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWR
1D Price
Change %
KWR100%
+2.94%
AVNT - KWR
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
ESI - KWR
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
CE - KWR
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
FUL - KWR
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
WLK - KWR
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.26%
More

LTHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTHM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LTHM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTHM
1D Price
Change %
LTHM100%
+4.07%
ALB - LTHM
79%
Closely correlated
+4.03%
SQM - LTHM
74%
Closely correlated
+7.48%
AVNT - LTHM
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
ESI - LTHM
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
CE - LTHM
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
More