It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMURGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MURGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while MURGF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.19%.
L is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
L | MURGF | L / MURGF | |
Capitalization | 17.4B | 52B | 33% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -1.370 | 2.548 | -54% |
P/E Ratio | 12.32 | 14.71 | 84% |
Revenue | 15.7B | 70.3B | 22% |
Total Cash | 45.2B | 5.82B | 777% |
Total Debt | 9B | 4.76B | 189% |
L | MURGF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MURGF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as L (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that MURGF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
MURGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as L (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that MURGF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
MURGF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as L (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that MURGF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MURGF (53) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MURGF’s over the last 12 months.
L's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as MURGF (65) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to MURGF’s over the last 12 months.
L | MURGF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago46% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago42% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 3 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago45% | 10 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MURGF has been loosely correlated with SSREY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MURGF jumps, then SSREY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MURGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MURGF | 100% | -3.66% | ||
SSREY - MURGF | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
HVRRY - MURGF | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
MURGY - MURGF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
L - MURGF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
SIGI - MURGF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More |