Ad is loading...
LAAGX vs RERCX
LAAGX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts LAAGX vs RERCX
Lord Abbett International Growth A
Price$13.69
Change-$0.41 (-2.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.36M
American Funds Europacific Growth R3
Price$52.47
Change-$1.52 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.35B
LAAGX vs RERCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. LAAGX (3.36M). RERCX pays higher dividends than LAAGX: RERCX (0.85) vs LAAGX (0.21). LAAGX was incepted earlier than RERCX: LAAGX (4 years) vs RERCX (23 years). LAAGX (9.37) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). LAAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RERCX (30.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAAGX: RERCX (250) vs LAAGX (1500). LAAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.50 vs. RERCX (-7.24).
| LAAGX | RERCX | LAAGX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.12 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.37 | 1.12 | 837% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.545 | 0.594 | 428% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36M | 125B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.85 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.50 | -7.24 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | -5.24 | -144% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 34.70 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.95 | - |