LABD
Price
$8.17
Change
-$0.65 (-7.37%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
80.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TZA
Price
$3.88
Change
+$0.02 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
212.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LABD vs TZA

LABD vs TZA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X Shares (LABD) vs. Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA)

Key Takeaways

  • LABD seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, providing targeted bearish exposure to the biotechnology sector.
  • TZA seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index, offering broad inverse exposure to U.S. small-capitalization equities across multiple sectors.
  • Both ETFs are leveraged inverse products from Direxion that use derivatives such as swaps and futures to achieve their daily targets, resulting in high volatility and the need for daily rebalancing.
  • LABD carries a net expense ratio of 1.07%, while TZA has a net expense ratio of 0.99%, reflecting slight differences in cost structure for similar leveraged strategies.
  • The ETFs do not compete directly; LABD focuses on a single volatile sector (biotechnology), whereas TZA provides diversified small-cap exposure, suiting different investor views on sector-specific versus broad-market declines.
  • Both funds are designed for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to compounding effects from daily resets and high sensitivity to market movements.

Introduction

Investors seeking inverse exposure to equity markets often turn to leveraged ETFs for amplified daily results. LABD and TZA represent specialized tools within this category, each targeting distinct segments of the U.S. equity landscape. LABD concentrates on biotechnology, a high-volatility sector, while TZA provides broad exposure to small-capitalization companies. They do not serve as direct substitutes but offer alternative strategies for investors with bearish outlooks on either sector-specific or small-cap performance. This comparison highlights their structural differences to aid in understanding appropriate use cases.

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X Shares (LABD) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X Shares (LABD) is a leveraged inverse exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. The index measures the performance of companies in the biotechnology sub-industry. As a leveraged product, LABD typically holds a small number of positions, primarily cash equivalents and derivatives such as total return swaps to achieve its target exposure. The fund maintains a net expense ratio of 1.07%. It is structured as an open-end fund and resets its leverage daily, making it suitable primarily for short-term tactical positioning rather than buy-and-hold strategies.

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) Overview

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) is a leveraged inverse exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse of the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. The Russell 2000 Index tracks approximately 2,000 small-capitalization U.S. companies. Like other Direxion leveraged products, TZA achieves its objective primarily through derivatives including swaps and futures contracts, with holdings centered on cash instruments and these instruments rather than a large portfolio of individual equities. The fund has a net expense ratio of 0.99%. It is an open-end fund subject to daily rebalancing to maintain its 3X inverse target.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate in environments shaped by broader equity market dynamics, interest rate expectations, and economic growth outlooks. Biotechnology companies often respond to clinical trial outcomes, regulatory decisions from agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and capital availability for research and development. Small-capitalization stocks, represented in the Russell 2000 Index, tend to be more sensitive to domestic economic conditions, borrowing costs, and shifts in investor risk appetite. Macroeconomic factors including inflation trends, Federal Reserve policy, and corporate earnings growth influence capital flows into or out of these segments. Regulatory developments in healthcare and changes in small-business lending conditions can also serve as catalysts for the respective underlying indexes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, performance of LABD and TZA has reflected divergences between biotechnology sector movements and the broader small-cap universe. LABD’s sector-specific focus can lead to amplified responses during periods of biotechnology earnings volatility or clinical news flow, while TZA captures wider small-cap rotations driven by economic data or interest rate shifts. Both funds exhibit elevated volatility due to their 3X daily leverage and require active monitoring because of the effects of compounding over multiple periods. Relative positioning depends on an investor’s view of biotechnology-specific catalysts versus overall small-cap momentum, with each ETF providing distinct risk exposures tied to its underlying index.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Professionals and retail investors alike can leverage this platform to refine their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, TZA may currently present a modestly more favorable profile for investors seeking broad small-cap inverse exposure due to its slightly lower expense ratio and diversified underlying index. LABD offers concentrated biotechnology sector access but carries higher potential volatility from its narrow focus. Selection ultimately depends on an investor’s specific market thesis regarding sector versus broad small-cap dynamics, with both products suited for tactical, short-term applications.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LABD vs. TZA commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABD is a Hold and TZA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TZA has more net assets: 212M vs. LABD (80.3M). TZA has a higher annual dividend yield than LABD: TZA (-47.586) vs LABD (-57.620). LABD was incepted earlier than TZA: LABD (11 years) vs TZA (18 years). TZA (0.99) has a lower expense ratio than LABD (1.07). LABD (0.00) and TZA (0.00) have matching turnover.
LABDTZALABD / TZA
Gain YTD-57.620-47.586121%
Net Assets80.3M212M38%
Total Expense Ratio1.070.99108%
Turnover0.000.00-
Yield7.394.96149%
Fund Existence11 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LABDTZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LABD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TZA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPCRX4.74N/A
N/A
Comstock Capital Value I
SABTX28.98N/A
N/A
SA US Value
ALSAX13.20N/A
N/A
Alger Small Cap Growth A
AEUDX9.07N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Income R6
GMNPX42.40N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras P