LABU vs NTLA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABU is a Hold and NTLA is a Hold.
NTLA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LABU | NTLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PREIX | 156.22 | 1.96 | +1.27% |
| T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 | |||
| GTTUX | 55.79 | 0.67 | +1.22% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R6 | |||
| LGMCX | 23.31 | 0.20 | +0.87% |
| Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C | |||
| HSUTX | 66.05 | 0.50 | +0.76% |
| Rational Dynamic Brands Instl | |||
| LICOX | 14.66 | 0.08 | +0.55% |
| Lord Abbett International Equity F3 | |||
LABU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been closely correlated with BEAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then BEAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LABU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LABU | 100% | +2.72% | ||
| BEAM - LABU | 72% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| DNLI - LABU | 69% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| FOLD - LABU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| CRSP - LABU | 66% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| NTLA - LABU | 66% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
NTLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTLA has been closely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTLA jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTLA | 100% | -0.74% | ||
| VCYT - NTLA | 69% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| EDIT - NTLA | 68% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| BEAM - NTLA | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| CRSP - NTLA | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| PRME - NTLA | 58% Loosely correlated | +12.04% | ||
More | ||||