LABU
Price
$263.18
Change
-$2.83 (-1.06%)
Updated
Sep 11, 01:57 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
522.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$89.87
Change
+$1.85 (+2.10%)
Updated
Sep 11, 02:02 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LABU vs QLD

LABU vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 04, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares (LABU) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • LABU provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the biotechnology sector through the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index, while QLD delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broader Nasdaq-100 Index focused on large-cap technology and growth companies.
  • Both ETFs employ derivatives such as swaps for leverage, resulting in daily reset mechanisms that make them suitable primarily for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to compounding effects.
  • LABU maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.96% compared to QLD's 0.95%, reflecting the specialized nature of biotech leveraged strategies.
  • Sector exposure differs markedly: LABU concentrates nearly 100% in biotechnology, offering thematic purity but higher volatility tied to clinical and regulatory developments, whereas QLD spreads across information technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors.
  • Liquidity profiles favor QLD with substantially larger assets under management (AUM), supporting tighter bid-ask spreads and greater trading volume in recent market cycles.
  • Structural risk profiles position LABU as a higher-beta instrument for biotech-specific catalysts, while QLD aligns more closely with overall equity market momentum and growth trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to high-growth sectors often compare leveraged ETFs like LABU and QLD as tools for tactical positioning rather than core holdings. These funds do not compete directly for the same underlying assets but represent alternative leveraged strategies targeting distinct segments of the equity market. LABU emphasizes biotechnology innovation, while QLD captures broader technology and growth leadership within the Nasdaq-100 Index. The comparison highlights differences in sector focus, leverage magnitude, cost efficiency, and risk dynamics that matter for investors navigating sector rotation and volatility in recent market cycles.

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares (LABU) Overview

The Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares (LABU) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. This modified equal-weighted index tracks U.S. biotechnology companies classified under Global Industry Classification Standards (GICS). The fund uses swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its 3x daily target and holds approximately 150-170 positions, with significant allocations to cash and collateral alongside swaps. Top holdings typically include biotechnology firms such as Moderna, Revolution Medicines, and Twist Bioscience, though the portfolio remains heavily synthetic. Sector allocation is nearly 100% biotechnology. The expense ratio stands at 0.96%. As a passive, daily-reset leveraged product, LABU requires frequent monitoring and suits short-term tactical use rather than buy-and-hold strategies.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

The ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. This market-capitalization-weighted index comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, with heavy emphasis on technology leaders. The fund employs swaps and derivatives for its 2x daily leverage and maintains around 120 holdings dominated by cash equivalents and index swaps. Top underlying exposures include companies such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector breakdown features dominant weights in information technology (approximately 39%), followed by communication services and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio is 0.95%. Like other daily leveraged ETFs, QLD resets exposure each day and is designed for short-term trading horizons.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader technology and healthcare innovation themes that have driven equity markets in recent cycles. Biotechnology faces catalysts from clinical trial readouts, regulatory approvals, and merger-and-acquisition (M&A) activity, alongside risks from trial failures and reimbursement pressures. The Nasdaq-100 benefits from artificial intelligence adoption, semiconductor demand, and digital transformation trends, tempered by valuation concerns and interest-rate sensitivity. Capital flows into growth-oriented sectors remain influenced by macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and monetary policy expectations. Regulatory developments in drug pricing and technology competition add layers of uncertainty, while sector rotation between value and growth styles continues to shape relative performance.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance dynamics have reflected distinct sector drivers. LABU's 3x biotech leverage amplifies moves tied to individual company catalysts and broader healthcare sentiment, resulting in elevated volatility compared with market benchmarks. QLD's 2x Nasdaq-100 exposure has aligned with technology earnings strength and growth momentum, though it remains sensitive to shifts in interest-rate expectations and large-cap concentration risks. Relative positioning shows LABU offering higher-beta participation in biotech-specific rallies but greater drawdown potential during sector rotations away from healthcare. QLD provides more diversified growth exposure with somewhat lower leverage intensity, supporting more consistent participation in equity uptrends across recent market cycles. Investors should note that daily compounding can cause significant divergence from expected multiples over longer periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader sector diversification, slightly lower expense ratio, larger scale supporting liquidity, and alignment with sustained technology momentum across recent market cycles, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to QLD for investors seeking leveraged growth exposure. LABU offers compelling thematic purity for biotechnology specialists but carries elevated concentration risk and higher leverage intensity that may suit narrower tactical applications.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LABU vs. QLD commentary
Sep 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABU is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 14.1B vs. LABU (522M). LABU has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: LABU (66.886) vs QLD (25.120). LABU was incepted earlier than QLD: LABU (11 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) and LABU (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . LABU has a higher turnover QLD (23.00) vs QLD (23.00).
LABUQLDLABU / QLD
Gain YTD66.88625.120266%
Net Assets522M14.1B4%
Total Expense Ratio0.960.95101%
Turnover107.0023.00465%
Yield0.340.13264%
Fund Existence11 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LABUQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
LABU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DJP53.380.74
+1.41%
iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN
MSST28.35N/A
N/A
YieldMax MSTR Perf & Dis Trgt 25 ETF
GSUS104.84-0.61
-0.58%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF
GEW55.77-0.41
-0.73%
Cambria Global EW ETF
INOV37.39-0.55
-1.46%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Nov

LABU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been loosely correlated with PRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then PRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LABU
1D Price
Change %
LABU100%
-4.67%
PRME - LABU
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
RCUS - LABU
59%
Loosely correlated
-8.21%
PGEN - LABU
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
LYEL - LABU
57%
Loosely correlated
-5.28%
LGND - LABU
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
More

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been loosely correlated with SWKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then SWKS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-2.18%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+9.79%
ZM - QLD
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
DOCU - QLD
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
ALGN - QLD
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
OKTA - QLD
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
More