Investors seeking amplified exposure to growth-oriented sectors often compare leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that target similar themes but through different mechanisms. LABU and QLD do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative leveraged strategies within the broader equity market. LABU focuses narrowly on biotechnology, while QLD provides leveraged participation in the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural trade-offs, risk profiles, and positioning relative to sector rotation and macroeconomic conditions.
LABU seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. The underlying index is equal-weighted and includes approximately 150 U.S. biotechnology companies. The ETF typically holds 148 to 171 positions, with top holdings representing a significant but diversified portion of assets within the biotech space. It operates as a leveraged, passive thematic product using swaps and other derivatives to achieve its daily target. The net expense ratio stands at 0.96%. LABU resets leverage daily and is intended for short-term trading rather than extended holding periods.
QLD seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The index comprises 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq, with heavy weighting toward technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services sectors. The ETF maintains roughly 100 to 112 holdings through a combination of direct securities and derivatives. It functions as a leveraged, passive product with a net expense ratio of 0.95%. Like other daily-reset leveraged ETFs, QLD is structured for short-term use, with rebalancing occurring daily to maintain the target multiple.
Both ETFs operate within high-growth equity themes influenced by innovation cycles, regulatory developments, and capital allocation trends. Biotechnology faces ongoing catalysts from clinical trial outcomes, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals, and merger-and-acquisition (M&A) activity, alongside risks from clinical failures and reimbursement pressures. Technology and communication services sectors benefit from artificial intelligence (AI) adoption, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation, though they remain sensitive to interest rate expectations, supply-chain dynamics, and competitive intensity. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and monetary policy continue to shape sector rotation between defensive healthcare subsectors and growth-oriented technology areas.
In recent market cycles, LABU has displayed higher volatility tied to biotechnology-specific news flow and equal-weighted index characteristics, resulting in amplified moves during sector rotations. QLD has shown more consistent alignment with broader technology leadership, benefiting from concentration in mega-cap names during periods of market breadth expansion. Relative positioning favors QLD in environments of sustained technology momentum, while LABU may offer differentiated exposure during biotechnology recovery phases. Both products magnify daily index returns, with the higher leverage in LABU increasing sensitivity to short-term swings compared with the 2x structure of QLD.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to compare leveraged products like LABU and QLD can leverage these capabilities to refine strategy development.
Based on observable structural factors, QLD currently presents a more balanced risk profile for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure. Its lower leverage multiple, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100 Index, and alignment with durable technology-sector trends support greater consistency in trend-following environments. LABU offers higher potential amplification within biotechnology but carries elevated concentration risk. Probabilistic assessment favors QLD for most tactical allocations in the current market environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| LABU | QLD | LABU / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 91.298 | 26.442 | 345% |
| Net Assets | 661M | 13.8B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.95 | 101% |
| Turnover | 107.00 | 16.00 | 669% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.14 | 319% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| LABU | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been loosely correlated with PRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then PRME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LABU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LABU | 100% | -10.73% | ||
| PRME - LABU | 62% Loosely correlated | -8.47% | ||
| RCUS - LABU | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| ROIV - LABU | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| PGEN - LABU | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.91% | ||
| LYEL - LABU | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -1.44% | ||
| MU - QLD | 70% Closely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| AVGO - QLD | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| ADI - QLD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| SWKS - QLD | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| INTC - QLD | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||