LABU
Price
$317.20
Change
+$12.29 (+4.03%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
660.97M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$89.53
Change
+$0.58 (+0.65%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
13.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LABU vs QLD

LABU vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares (LABU) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • LABU delivers 3x daily exposure to an equal-weighted index of U.S. biotechnology companies, concentrating risk in a single healthcare subsector with high volatility.
  • QLD provides 2x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, offering leveraged access to a diversified basket of large-cap technology, consumer, and communication services companies.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leverage and are designed for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies due to compounding effects.
  • Expense ratios are similar, with LABU at 0.96% and QLD at 0.95%, reflecting the costs of derivatives and active management in leveraged products.
  • LABU exhibits greater sector concentration and sensitivity to biotechnology-specific catalysts, while QLD benefits from broader technology-sector momentum and larger average daily trading volume.
  • Structural differences in leverage multiple, underlying index composition, and rebalancing frequency create distinct risk-return profiles suited to different market environments.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to growth-oriented sectors often compare leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that target similar themes but through different mechanisms. LABU and QLD do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative leveraged strategies within the broader equity market. LABU focuses narrowly on biotechnology, while QLD provides leveraged participation in the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index. This comparison helps investors evaluate structural trade-offs, risk profiles, and positioning relative to sector rotation and macroeconomic conditions.

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares (LABU) Overview

LABU seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. The underlying index is equal-weighted and includes approximately 150 U.S. biotechnology companies. The ETF typically holds 148 to 171 positions, with top holdings representing a significant but diversified portion of assets within the biotech space. It operates as a leveraged, passive thematic product using swaps and other derivatives to achieve its daily target. The net expense ratio stands at 0.96%. LABU resets leverage daily and is intended for short-term trading rather than extended holding periods.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The index comprises 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq, with heavy weighting toward technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services sectors. The ETF maintains roughly 100 to 112 holdings through a combination of direct securities and derivatives. It functions as a leveraged, passive product with a net expense ratio of 0.95%. Like other daily-reset leveraged ETFs, QLD is structured for short-term use, with rebalancing occurring daily to maintain the target multiple.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within high-growth equity themes influenced by innovation cycles, regulatory developments, and capital allocation trends. Biotechnology faces ongoing catalysts from clinical trial outcomes, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals, and merger-and-acquisition (M&A) activity, alongside risks from clinical failures and reimbursement pressures. Technology and communication services sectors benefit from artificial intelligence (AI) adoption, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation, though they remain sensitive to interest rate expectations, supply-chain dynamics, and competitive intensity. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and monetary policy continue to shape sector rotation between defensive healthcare subsectors and growth-oriented technology areas.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, LABU has displayed higher volatility tied to biotechnology-specific news flow and equal-weighted index characteristics, resulting in amplified moves during sector rotations. QLD has shown more consistent alignment with broader technology leadership, benefiting from concentration in mega-cap names during periods of market breadth expansion. Relative positioning favors QLD in environments of sustained technology momentum, while LABU may offer differentiated exposure during biotechnology recovery phases. Both products magnify daily index returns, with the higher leverage in LABU increasing sensitivity to short-term swings compared with the 2x structure of QLD.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to compare leveraged products like LABU and QLD can leverage these capabilities to refine strategy development.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, QLD currently presents a more balanced risk profile for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure. Its lower leverage multiple, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100 Index, and alignment with durable technology-sector trends support greater consistency in trend-following environments. LABU offers higher potential amplification within biotechnology but carries elevated concentration risk. Probabilistic assessment favors QLD for most tactical allocations in the current market environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LABU vs. QLD commentary
Aug 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABU is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.8B vs. LABU (661M). LABU has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: LABU (91.298) vs QLD (26.442). LABU was incepted earlier than QLD: LABU (11 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) and LABU (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . LABU has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
LABUQLDLABU / QLD
Gain YTD91.29826.442345%
Net Assets661M13.8B5%
Total Expense Ratio0.960.95101%
Turnover107.0016.00669%
Yield0.450.14319%
Fund Existence11 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LABUQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LABU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTCEX26.81-0.22
-0.81%
Glenmede Strategic Equity
FFEFX17.60-0.17
-0.96%
Nuveen Dividend Value R6
PBQAX28.14-0.33
-1.16%
PGIM Jennison Blend A
FRDRX97.91-1.25
-1.26%
Franklin Rising Dividends R
LSRCX1.09-0.02
-1.80%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C

LABU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been loosely correlated with PRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then PRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LABU
1D Price
Change %
LABU100%
-10.73%
PRME - LABU
62%
Loosely correlated
-8.47%
RCUS - LABU
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
ROIV - LABU
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
PGEN - LABU
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.91%
LYEL - LABU
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
More

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-1.44%
MU - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
AVGO - QLD
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
ADI - QLD
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
SWKS - QLD
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
INTC - QLD
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
More