LABU
Price
$317.20
Change
+$12.29 (+4.03%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
660.97M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$70.15
Change
+$0.54 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
8.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LABU vs SSO

LABU vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF (LABU) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF (LABU) provides 3x daily leveraged exposure to the biotechnology sector, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index.
  • LABU concentrates holdings in a narrow, high-volatility industry with approximately 100 holdings focused on healthcare, whereas SSO offers broad diversification across roughly 500 large-cap U.S. companies spanning multiple sectors.
  • LABU carries a higher expense ratio of 0.96% compared to SSO’s 0.87%, reflecting the complexity of its thematic leveraged strategy.
  • Both ETFs employ derivatives such as swaps and futures for daily leverage reset, making them suitable for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • LABU offers targeted thematic exposure to biotechnology innovation, while SSO provides amplified broad-market participation with lower sector-specific risk.
  • Structural differences in leverage, concentration, and cost position the two ETFs as complementary rather than direct competitors for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure.

Introduction

Investors seeking leveraged equity exposure often compare specialized thematic products with broad-market alternatives. Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF (LABU) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) represent distinct approaches within the leveraged ETF category. LABU targets the biotechnology sub-industry, while SSO amplifies the performance of the entire S&P 500. They do not compete directly but serve investors pursuing different risk-reward profiles and sector tilts. This comparison highlights their structural differences to help investors evaluate positioning within current market cycles.

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF (LABU) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF (LABU) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. The fund uses swaps and other derivatives to achieve this 3x daily leverage and resets exposure each trading day. It holds a concentrated portfolio of approximately 100 biotechnology companies, with top positions typically including firms such as Apogee Therapeutics, Moderna, and Twist Bioscience. Sector allocation is nearly 100% healthcare, specifically biotechnology. The expense ratio stands at 0.96%. LABU is a passive, leveraged, thematic product designed for short-term trading rather than core long-term holdings.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund employs total return swaps, futures, and other derivatives to deliver 2x daily exposure, with daily reset mechanics. It provides broad diversification across approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies, with significant weightings in information technology, healthcare, financials, and consumer sectors. The expense ratio is 0.87%. SSO operates as a passive, leveraged, broad-market vehicle suited for tactical market amplification rather than extended holding periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The biotechnology sector faces ongoing innovation cycles driven by drug development pipelines, regulatory approvals, and clinical trial outcomes, alongside sensitivity to interest rate environments and capital availability for research. The broader equity market, represented by the S&P 500, reflects macroeconomic factors including corporate earnings growth, monetary policy shifts, and economic expansion. Capital flows into healthcare innovation and large-cap technology continue to influence both areas. Risks include sector-specific volatility in biotech from binary clinical results and broader market drawdowns amplified by leverage in both ETFs. Regulatory developments around drug pricing and patent protections remain key variables for the biotechnology theme.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X ETF (LABU) has exhibited higher volatility due to its concentrated biotechnology focus and elevated 3x leverage, leading to amplified moves during sector rotation and earnings seasons for key holdings. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has shown more moderated volatility through its 2x leverage on a diversified S&P 500 basket, with performance tied to overall market trends rather than isolated industry catalysts. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking broad equity beta with moderate amplification, while LABU suits those targeting biotechnology momentum. Both products experience compounding effects from daily resets that can diverge significantly from underlying index returns over longer periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader diversification, lower expense ratio, and more moderate leverage profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) for investors seeking leveraged equity exposure with reduced sector concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LABU vs. SSO commentary
Aug 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LABU is a Hold and SSO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.36B vs. LABU (661M). LABU has a higher annual dividend yield than SSO: LABU (91.298) vs SSO (20.681). LABU was incepted earlier than SSO: LABU (11 years) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than LABU (0.96). LABU has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
LABUSSOLABU / SSO
Gain YTD91.29820.681441%
Net Assets661M8.36B8%
Total Expense Ratio0.960.87110%
Turnover107.004.002,675%
Yield0.450.6766%
Fund Existence11 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LABUSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LABU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXEQ28.46N/A
N/A
Wedbush ReturnOnLdrsp(R)U.S.Large-CapETF
USTB50.46-0.03
-0.05%
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
ZIG40.90-0.15
-0.37%
The Acquirers ETF
LRND45.97-0.32
-0.70%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
CRWG20.60-0.49
-2.32%
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF

LABU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LABU has been loosely correlated with PRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LABU jumps, then PRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LABU
1D Price
Change %
LABU100%
-10.73%
PRME - LABU
62%
Loosely correlated
-8.47%
RCUS - LABU
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
ROIV - LABU
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
PGEN - LABU
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.91%
LYEL - LABU
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.60%
More

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
-1.69%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%