LAC
Price
$2.91
Change
-$0.11 (-3.64%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MP
Price
$50.51
Change
-$0.81 (-1.58%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
9B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAC vs MP

LAC vs MP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAC vs. MP commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a StrongBuy and MP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($9B) has a higher market cap than LAC($1.06B). MP YTD gains are higher at: -0.020 vs. LAC (-33.257). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 61.8M vs. LAC (-56.29M). MP has more cash in the bank: 1.45B vs. LAC (823M). MP has less debt than LAC: MP (935M) vs LAC (1.16B). MP has higher revenues than LAC: MP (305M) vs LAC (0).
LACMPLAC / MP
Capitalization1.06B9B12%
EBITDA-56.29M61.8M-91%
Gain YTD-33.257-0.020167,978%
P/E RatioN/A770.50-
Revenue0305M-
Total Cash823M1.45B57%
Total Debt1.16B935M124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC vs MP: Fundamental Ratings
LAC
MP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6572
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
17n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAC's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MP (93). This means that LAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MP’s over the last 12 months.

MP's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (100). This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

MP's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LAC (93). This means that MP’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MP (72). This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to MP’s over the last 12 months.

MP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAC (100). This means that MP’s stock grew significantly faster than LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2026
Stock price -- (LAC: $2.91 vs. MP: $50.51)
Brand notoriety: LAC and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 113% vs. MP: 80%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.06B vs. MP: $9B
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.06B. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $230 to $223.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the long-term than MP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the short-term than LAC.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.00% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

View a ticker or compare two or three
LAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANVHX11.690.10
+0.86%
American Century Non-US Intrs Val I
FMUFX16.650.10
+0.60%
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv F
IGIAX139.570.22
+0.16%
Integrity Growth & Income Fund A
CWICX81.660.03
+0.04%
American Funds Cptl Wld Gr&Inc 529-C
BILPX10.52N/A
N/A
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Instl

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with SLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then SLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-3.64%
SLI - LAC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
LAR - LAC
59%
Loosely correlated
-8.74%
NB - LAC
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
MP - LAC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
USAR - LAC
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been closely correlated with USAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MP jumps, then USAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-1.58%
USAR - MP
75%
Closely correlated
-2.99%
UAMY - MP
68%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
CRML - MP
66%
Closely correlated
-4.32%
LAR - MP
57%
Loosely correlated
-8.74%
SLI - MP
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More