LAC
Price
$4.49
Change
-$0.18 (-3.85%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
MP
Price
$15.73
Change
-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Updated
Apr 24, 6:59 PM EST
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAC vs MP ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconLAC vs MP Comparison
Open Charts LAC vs MPBanner chart's image
Lithium Americas
Price$4.49
Change-$0.18 (-3.85%)
Volume$2.18M
CapitalizationN/A
MP Materials
Price$15.73
Change-$0.13 (-0.82%)
Volume$691.45K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LAC vs MP Comparison Chart

Loading...

LACDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
LAC vs. MP commentary
Apr 25, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAC is a Hold and MP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2024
Stock price -- (LAC: $4.68 vs. MP: $15.86)
Brand notoriety: LAC and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAC: 112% vs. MP: 62%
Market capitalization -- LAC: $1.14B vs. MP: $2.37B
LAC [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAC and MP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAC is a better buy in the short-term than MP.

Price Growth

LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -27.89% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2023.

MP is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.00% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for LAC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MP with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than LAC($1.14B). MP YTD gains are higher at: -20.101 vs. LAC (-26.875). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. LAC (-3.27M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. LAC (196M). LAC has less debt than MP: LAC (3.11M) vs MP (689M). MP has higher revenues than LAC: MP (253M) vs LAC (0).
LACMPLAC / MP
Capitalization1.14B2.37B48%
EBITDA-3.27M94M-3%
Gain YTD-26.875-20.101134%
P/E RatioN/A107.71-
Revenue0253M-
Total Cash196M998M20%
Total Debt3.11M689M0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LACMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LACDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
MPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGISX8.680.10
+1.17%
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure S
COSYX10.730.12
+1.13%
Columbia Overseas Value Inst3
GLNKX20.820.18
+0.87%
MFS Global New Discovery R2
FACNX66.800.53
+0.80%
Fidelity Advisor Canada A
VEIPX42.050.26
+0.62%
Vanguard Equity-Income Inv

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with PLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then PLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-0.38%
PLL - MP
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
FCX - MP
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
BHP - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
RIO - MP
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
HBM - MP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More