Ad is loading...
LAFAX vs REEBX
LAFAX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFAX vs REEBX
Columbia Acorn International Sel A
Price$26.84
Change-$0.12 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.49M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2E
Price$56.45
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
LAFAX vs REEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFAX vs. REEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFAX is a Buy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. LAFAX (193M). LAFAX pays higher dividends than REEBX: LAFAX (0.89) vs REEBX (0.70). LAFAX was incepted earlier than REEBX: LAFAX (25 years) vs REEBX (11 years). LAFAX (1.44) is less costly to investors than REEBX (1.27). LAFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. REEBX (30.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFAX: REEBX (250) vs LAFAX (2000). LAFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. REEBX (-1.22). REEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. LAFAX (13.57).
| LAFAX | REEBX | LAFAX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.27 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.27 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.069 | 7.014 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.70 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | -1.22 | -338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.96 | 19.38 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.57 | 23.56 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.66 | 13.91 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...