Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.45B vs. WCMLX (53.1M). LAGWX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (53 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.07 vs. WCMLX (25.56). LAGWX return over 5 years is better than : 11.88 vs. WCMLX (0.33).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.965 | 10.683 | 280% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 53.1M | 4,605% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.07 | 25.56 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.65 | 33.71 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.88 | 0.33 | 3,607% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement