Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LALDX vs PLCCX
LALDX vs PLCCX Comparison
Open Charts LALDX vs PLCCX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.34B
PIMCO Low Duration C-2
Price$9.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
LALDX vs PLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LALDX vs. PLCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LALDX is a Hold and PLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. PLCCX (6.63B). LALDX pays higher dividends than PLCCX: LALDX (5.01) vs PLCCX (3.35). LALDX was incepted earlier than PLCCX: LALDX (32 years) vs PLCCX (5 years). PLCCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than LALDX (0.58). PLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 497.00 vs. LALDX (92.00). PLCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LALDX: PLCCX (1000) vs LALDX (1500). LALDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. PLCCX (4.78).
| LALDX | PLCCX | LALDX / PLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.34 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.34 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.124 | 1.847 | 115% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 6.63B | 638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.01 | 3.35 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 4.78 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.21 | 9.43 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.39 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement