Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LALDX vs SMCMX
LALDX vs SMCMX Comparison
Open Charts LALDX vs SMCMX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.33B
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond C
Price$10.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets620.27M
LALDX vs SMCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LALDX vs. SMCMX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LALDX is a Hold and SMCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. SMCMX (620M). LALDX pays higher dividends than SMCMX: LALDX (5.01) vs SMCMX (3.33). LALDX was incepted earlier than SMCMX: LALDX (32 years) vs SMCMX (7 years). SMCMX (1.53) is less costly to investors than LALDX (0.58). SMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 157.00 vs. LALDX (92.00). LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMCMX: LALDX (1500) vs SMCMX (2500). LALDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. SMCMX (4.73). LALDX return over 5 years is better than : 13.49 vs. SMCMX (6.15).
| LALDX | SMCMX | LALDX / SMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.49 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.53 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.124 | 1.876 | 113% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 620M | 6,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.01 | 3.33 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 4.73 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.78 | 9.07 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.49 | 6.15 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement