Ad is loading...
LALDX vs SMCMX
LALDX vs SMCMX Comparison
Open Charts LALDX vs SMCMX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.3B
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond C
Price$10.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets616.95M
LALDX vs SMCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LALDX vs. SMCMX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LALDX is a Hold and SMCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.3B vs. SMCMX (617M). LALDX pays higher dividends than SMCMX: LALDX (4.97) vs SMCMX (3.32). LALDX was incepted earlier than SMCMX: LALDX (32 years) vs SMCMX (7 years). SMCMX (1.53) is less costly to investors than LALDX (0.58). SMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 157.00 vs. LALDX (92.00). LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMCMX: LALDX (1500) vs SMCMX (2500). LALDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.49 vs. SMCMX (5.04). LALDX return over 5 years is better than : 15.53 vs. SMCMX (7.57).
| LALDX | SMCMX | LALDX / SMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.49 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.53 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.934 | 1.793 | 108% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3B | 617M | 6,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.97 | 3.32 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 5.04 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.55 | 9.25 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.53 | 7.57 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers