Ad is loading...
LAMFX vs VSTSX
LAMFX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VSTSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$21.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$248.07
Change+$0.58 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMFX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VSTSX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMFX (3.88B). VSTSX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VSTSX (1.37) vs LAMFX (0.80). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). LAMFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: LAMFX (0) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. LAMFX (3.85). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 81.50 vs. LAMFX (53.72).
| LAMFX | VSTSX | LAMFX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.01 | 6,500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.01 | 7,500% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.508 | -10.641 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.37 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 4.62 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.64 | 17.89 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.72 | 81.50 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...