Ad is loading...
LAMHX vs VITSX
LAMHX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMHX vs VITSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$21.90
Change+$1.59 (+7.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$129.89
Change+$11.31 (+9.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMHX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMHX vs. VITSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMHX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMHX (3.65B). VITSX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: VITSX (1.36) vs LAMHX (0.89). LAMHX was incepted earlier than VITSX: LAMHX (10 years) vs VITSX (28 years). LAMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: LAMHX (0) vs VITSX (5000000). LAMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. VITSX (-5.42). VITSX return over 5 years is better than : 75.44 vs. LAMHX (48.98).
| LAMHX | VITSX | LAMHX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,000% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.864 | -15.904 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.36 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.12 | -5.42 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.73 | 8.75 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.98 | 75.44 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...