Ad is loading...
LAMQX vs VTSMX
LAMQX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMQX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
Price$21.74
Change+$1.58 (+7.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$125.25
Change-$4.60 (-3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7T
LAMQX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMQX vs. VTSMX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMQX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.7T vs. LAMQX (3.65B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMQX: VTSMX (1.25) vs LAMQX (0.31). LAMQX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMQX (18 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMQX (1.25) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMQX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMQX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.43 vs. LAMQX (-5.76). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 75.41 vs. LAMQX (45.61).
| LAMQX | VTSMX | LAMQX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.14 | 893% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.999 | -15.905 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 1.7T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.25 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.76 | -5.43 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.11 | 8.73 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.61 | 75.41 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.51 | 131.53 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...