Advertisement
LANC vs PLUG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Buy and PLUG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLUG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PLUG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLUG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PLUG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while PLUG (@Electrical Products) price change was +14.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
PLUG is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.14% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Electrical Products (-1.67% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| LANC | PLUG | LANC / PLUG | |
| Capitalization | 5.67B | 2.35B | 241% |
| EBITDA | 244M | -1.26B | -19% |
| Gain YTD | -1.772 | -57.239 | 3% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.94 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.87B | 891M | 210% |
| Total Cash | 134M | 135M | 99% |
| Total Debt | 13.3M | 969M | 1% |
LANC | PLUG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLUG's Valuation (44) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as LANC (61) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PLUG’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLUG (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLUG’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's SMR Rating (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLUG (95) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLUG’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLUG (93) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLUG’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as PLUG (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to PLUG’s over the last 12 months.
| LANC | PLUG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 7 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAPU | 21.86 | 0.33 | +1.53% |
| Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | |||
| RECS | 35.22 | 0.18 | +0.51% |
| Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF | |||
| FCTR | 33.38 | 0.08 | +0.25% |
| First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF | |||
| HMOP | 37.94 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF | |||
| MSFD | 12.13 | -0.03 | -0.25% |
| Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF | |||
LANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANC | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| JBSS - LANC | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| FLO - LANC | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| MDLZ - LANC | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| JJSF - LANC | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CENTA - LANC | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||