LANC
Price
$173.54
Change
-$1.66 (-0.95%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.67B
28 days until earnings call
SENEA
Price
$87.27
Change
-$2.68 (-2.98%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
404.39M
Ad is loading...

LANC vs SENEA

Header iconLANC vs SENEA Comparison
Open Charts LANC vs SENEABanner chart's image
Lancaster Colony
Price$173.54
Change-$1.66 (-0.95%)
Volume$117.32K
Capitalization5.67B
Seneca Foods
Price$87.27
Change-$2.68 (-2.98%)
Volume$35.12K
Capitalization404.39M
LANC vs SENEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANC vs. SENEA commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Hold and SENEA is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LANC: $173.54 vs. SENEA: $87.27)
Brand notoriety: LANC and SENEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANC: 73% vs. SENEA: 142%
Market capitalization -- LANC: $5.67B vs. SENEA: $404.39M
LANC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.67B. SENEA’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $404.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SENEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SENEA is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENEA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SENEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LANC is a better buy in the short-term than SENEA.

Price Growth

LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while SENEA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LANC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SENEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.06% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LANC($5.67B) has a higher market cap than SENEA($404M). LANC has higher P/E ratio than SENEA: LANC (43.94) vs SENEA (7.41). SENEA YTD gains are higher at: 10.106 vs. LANC (0.730). LANC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 244M vs. SENEA (145M). LANC has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. SENEA (7.17M). LANC has less debt than SENEA: LANC (13.3M) vs SENEA (669M). LANC has higher revenues than SENEA: LANC (1.87B) vs SENEA (1.48B).
LANCSENEALANC / SENEA
Capitalization5.67B404M1,404%
EBITDA244M145M168%
Gain YTD0.73010.1067%
P/E Ratio43.947.41593%
Revenue1.87B1.48B126%
Total Cash134M7.17M1,869%
Total Debt13.3M669M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LANC vs SENEA: Fundamental Ratings
LANC
SENEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2020
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5621
SMR RATING
1..100
5280
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LANC's Valuation (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (75). This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (56). This means that SENEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

LANC's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SENEA (80). This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to SENEA’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LANC (59). This means that SENEA’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

SENEA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for LANC (82). This means that SENEA’s stock grew significantly faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANCSENEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SENEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPT34.690.32
+0.93%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF
TOK115.130.95
+0.84%
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
XJUL35.520.16
+0.46%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Jul
HIYS25.17N/A
N/A
Invesco High Yield Select ETF
VKQ9.69-0.07
-0.72%
Invesco Municipal Trust

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
-0.95%
JBSS - LANC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
SENEA - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
FLO - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
MDLZ - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
HAIN - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

SENEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENEA has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SENEA jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SENEA
1D Price
Change %
SENEA100%
-2.98%
FLO - SENEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
LANC - SENEA
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
JJSF - SENEA
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
JBSS - SENEA
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
HAIN - SENEA
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More