LANC
Price
$181.35
Change
+$6.28 (+3.59%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.67B
27 days until earnings call
SMPL
Price
$34.04
Change
-$0.68 (-1.96%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.4B
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LANC vs SMPL

Header iconLANC vs SMPL Comparison
Open Charts LANC vs SMPLBanner chart's image
Lancaster Colony
Price$181.35
Change+$6.28 (+3.59%)
Volume$304
Capitalization5.67B
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
Price$34.04
Change-$0.68 (-1.96%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.4B
LANC vs SMPL Comparison Chart
Loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANC vs. SMPL commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Hold and SMPL is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LANC: $175.07 vs. SMPL: $34.72)
Brand notoriety: LANC and SMPL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANC: 113% vs. SMPL: 173%
Market capitalization -- LANC: $5.67B vs. SMPL: $3.4B
LANC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5.67B. SMPL’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMPL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMPL is a better buy in the long-term than LANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMPL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LANC is a better buy in the short-term than SMPL.

Price Growth

LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

LANC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SMPL is expected to report earnings on Jun 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.48% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LANC($5.67B) has a higher market cap than SMPL($3.4B). LANC has higher P/E ratio than SMPL: LANC (43.94) vs SMPL (26.07). LANC YTD gains are higher at: 1.618 vs. SMPL (-10.929). LANC (244M) and SMPL (234M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . LANC has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. SMPL (121M). LANC has less debt than SMPL: LANC (13.3M) vs SMPL (272M). LANC has higher revenues than SMPL: LANC (1.87B) vs SMPL (1.25B).
LANCSMPLLANC / SMPL
Capitalization5.67B3.4B167%
EBITDA244M234M104%
Gain YTD1.618-10.929-15%
P/E Ratio43.9426.07169%
Revenue1.87B1.25B149%
Total Cash134M121M111%
Total Debt13.3M272M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LANC vs SMPL: Fundamental Ratings
LANC
SMPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5229
SMR RATING
1..100
5276
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8039
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LANC's Valuation (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (88) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LANC (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew similarly to LANC’s over the last 12 months.

LANC's SMR Rating (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (76) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

LANC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SMPL (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to SMPL’s over the last 12 months.

SMPL's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LANC (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that SMPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANCSMPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDSTX23.63N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts Inv
ACGQX21.36N/A
N/A
Invesco Growth and Income R5
DAADX9.84N/A
N/A
DFA Emerging Mkts ex China Cr Eq Instl
AMALX10.28N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Dividend G
CLBFX33.37-0.88
-2.57%
American Funds American Balanced 529F

LANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANC
1D Price
Change %
LANC100%
+0.88%
JBSS - LANC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
SENEA - LANC
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
FLO - LANC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
MDLZ - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
JJSF - LANC
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More

SMPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMPL
1D Price
Change %
SMPL100%
+0.29%
FLO - SMPL
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
SJM - SMPL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
GIS - SMPL
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
CAG - SMPL
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
CPB - SMPL
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
More