It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LARK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLCNB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LARK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCNB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
LARK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.81% price change this week, while LCNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.
LARK is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
LCNB is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
LARK | LCNB | LARK / LCNB | |
Capitalization | 105M | 211M | 50% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 30.180 | 5.572 | 542% |
P/E Ratio | 8.64 | 13.73 | 63% |
Revenue | 56.5M | 67.9M | 83% |
Total Cash | N/A | 23.1M | - |
Total Debt | 99M | 217M | 46% |
LARK | LCNB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LARK's Valuation (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LCNB (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to LCNB’s over the last 12 months.
LARK's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCNB (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCNB’s over the last 12 months.
LARK's SMR Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LCNB (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to LCNB’s over the last 12 months.
LARK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LCNB (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to LCNB’s over the last 12 months.
LCNB's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (28) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that LCNB’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.
LARK | LCNB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago57% | 7 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MKSPX | 30.67 | N/A | N/A |
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap K | |||
TISLX | 10.57 | -0.26 | -2.40% |
Transamerica Intl Sust Eq R6 | |||
NFEPX | 20.83 | -0.78 | -3.61% |
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst | |||
FCVTX | 18.75 | -0.77 | -3.94% |
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value M | |||
ICSSX | 16.72 | -0.71 | -4.07% |
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II S |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LARK and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LARK and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LARK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LARK | 100% | -2.53% | ||
SSBI - LARK | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
ECBK - LARK | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.72% | ||
FGBI - LARK | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.77% | ||
BANC - LARK | 24% Poorly correlated | -6.01% | ||
LCNB - LARK | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.98% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCNB has been closely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCNB jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCNB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LCNB | 100% | -5.98% | ||
PFIS - LCNB | 67% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
MCBS - LCNB | 67% Closely correlated | -5.89% | ||
MBCN - LCNB | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.58% | ||
HBCP - LCNB | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.29% | ||
MPB - LCNB | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
More |