LBCMF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
LCKYF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

LBCMF vs LCKYF

Header iconLBCMF vs LCKYF Comparison
Open Charts LBCMF vs LCKYFBanner chart's image
Libero Copper & Gold
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
GOLDEN SKY MINERALS
Price$0.07
Change+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Volume$23.1K
CapitalizationN/A
LBCMF vs LCKYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LBCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBCMF vs. LCKYF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBCMF is a StrongBuy and LCKYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (LBCMF: $0.24 vs. LCKYF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: LBCMF and LCKYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBCMF: 0% vs. LCKYF: 491%
Market capitalization -- LBCMF: $3.67M vs. LCKYF: $2M
LBCMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.67M. LCKYF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLCKYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LBCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LCKYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LCKYF is a better buy in the long-term than LBCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBCMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCKYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LCKYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LCKYF is a better buy in the short-term than LBCMF.

Price Growth

LBCMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.72% price change this week, while LCKYF (@Precious Metals) price change was +33.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBCMF($3.67M) has a higher market cap than LCKYF($2M). LBCMF YTD gains are higher at: 65.850 vs. LCKYF (-2.571). LCKYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -968.35K vs. LBCMF (-12.87M). LCKYF has more cash in the bank: 1.43M vs. LBCMF (984K). LBCMF (0) and LCKYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LBCMFLCKYFLBCMF / LCKYF
Capitalization3.67M2M183%
EBITDA-12.87M-968.35K1,329%
Gain YTD65.850-2.571-2,561%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash984K1.43M69%
Total Debt295KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBCMF vs LCKYF: Fundamental Ratings
LBCMF
LCKYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
295
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5386
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LCKYF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBCMF (63). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LCKYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LBCMF (100). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew similarly to LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LCKYF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LBCMF (99). This means that LCKYF’s stock grew similarly to LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LBCMF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LCKYF (86). This means that LBCMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LCKYF’s over the last 12 months.

LBCMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LCKYF (100). This means that LBCMF’s stock grew similarly to LCKYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBCMFLCKYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LBCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LCKYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAGBX2.45N/A
N/A
Templeton Global Balanced A
PAECX20.11N/A
N/A
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr C
AEDFX11.62-0.05
-0.43%
Water Island Event-Driven Fund R
ARBFX12.80-0.16
-1.23%
Arbitrage R
JAENX138.85-4.44
-3.10%
Janus Henderson Enterprise T

LBCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBCMF and ZCTSF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBCMF and ZCTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBCMF
1D Price
Change %
LBCMF100%
+2.74%
ZCTSF - LBCMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-16.55%
KTGDF - LBCMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.87%
KSSRF - LBCMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOREF - LBCMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
LCKYF - LBCMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LCKYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCKYF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LCKYF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCKYF
1D Price
Change %
LCKYF100%
N/A
VITFF - LCKYF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VLMZF - LCKYF
38%
Loosely correlated
+316.67%
SVGAF - LCKYF
37%
Loosely correlated
-53.85%
GORIF - LCKYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SICNF - LCKYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More