Ad is loading...
LBDFX vs PIINX
LBDFX vs PIINX Comparison
Open Charts LBDFX vs PIINX
Lord Abbett Bond-Debenture F
Price$6.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.05B
LBDFX vs PIINX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDFX vs. PIINX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDFX is a Buy and PIINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIINX has more cash in the bank: 181B vs. LBDFX (21B). LBDFX (6.19) and PIINX (5.94) have matching dividends . LBDFX was incepted earlier than PIINX: LBDFX (18 years) vs PIINX (18 years). PIINX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LBDFX (0.74). PIINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. LBDFX (290.00). LBDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIINX: LBDFX (0) vs PIINX (1000000). PIINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. LBDFX (5.07). PIINX return over 5 years is better than : 24.22 vs. LBDFX (20.51).
| LBDFX | PIINX | LBDFX / PIINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.238 | 2.586 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21B | 181B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.19 | 5.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 6.76 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | 17.36 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.51 | 24.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.67 | 48.52 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers