Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBNRX vs PONAX
LBNRX vs PONAX Comparison
Open Charts LBNRX vs PONAX
Lord Abbett Bond-Debenture R3
Price$7.18
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.56B
LBNRX vs PONAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBNRX vs. PONAX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBNRX is a Buy and PONAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 190B vs. LBNRX (21.6B). PONAX (5.75) and LBNRX (5.67) have matching dividends . LBNRX was incepted earlier than PONAX: LBNRX (18 years) vs PONAX (18 years). PONAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than LBNRX (1.14). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. LBNRX (290.00). LBNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONAX: LBNRX (0) vs PONAX (1000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. LBNRX (7.05). PONAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.03 vs. LBNRX (11.90).
| LBNRX | PONAX | LBNRX / PONAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.23 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.23 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.312 | 6.192 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6B | 190B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 5.75 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | 7.47 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 19.54 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 20.03 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.41 | 51.22 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers