LBSR
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
NWCCF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

LBSR vs NWCCF

Header iconLBSR vs NWCCF Comparison
Open Charts LBSR vs NWCCFBanner chart's image
Liberty Star Uranium & Metals
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.83K
CapitalizationN/A
NORTHWEST COPPER
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
LBSR vs NWCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
LBSR vs. NWCCF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSR is a Hold and NWCCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (LBSR: $0.25 vs. NWCCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: LBSR and NWCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBSR: 16% vs. NWCCF: 99%
Market capitalization -- LBSR: $1.54M vs. NWCCF: $25.81M
LBSR [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.54M. NWCCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $25.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBSR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LBSR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWCCF is a better buy in the long-term than LBSR.

Price Growth

LBSR (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.97% price change this week, while NWCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

LBSR is expected to report earnings on Dec 14, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWCCF($25.8M) has a higher market cap than LBSR($1.54M). NWCCF YTD gains are higher at: -8.940 vs. LBSR (-19.677). LBSR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -106.86K vs. NWCCF (-655.21K). NWCCF has more cash in the bank: 3.76M vs. LBSR (6.11K). NWCCF has less debt than LBSR: NWCCF (112K) vs LBSR (224K). LBSR (0) and NWCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LBSRNWCCFLBSR / NWCCF
Capitalization1.54M25.8M6%
EBITDA-106.86K-655.21K16%
Gain YTD-19.677-8.940220%
P/E Ratio1.19N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.11K3.76M0%
Total Debt224K112K200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBSR vs NWCCF: Fundamental Ratings
LBSR
NWCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10025
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LBSR's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as NWCCF (96). This means that LBSR’s stock grew similarly to NWCCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NWCCF (100). This means that LBSR’s stock grew similarly to NWCCF’s over the last 12 months.

NWCCF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as LBSR (100). This means that NWCCF’s stock grew similarly to LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

LBSR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NWCCF (65). This means that LBSR’s stock grew similarly to NWCCF’s over the last 12 months.

NWCCF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBSR (100). This means that NWCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

LBSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBSR and CTXDF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBSR and CTXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBSR
1D Price
Change %
LBSR100%
-0.20%
CTXDF - LBSR
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDDYF - LBSR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRBFF - LBSR
14%
Poorly correlated
+13.73%
NWCCF - LBSR
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBMFF - LBSR
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.19%
More

NWCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWCCF and CHXMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWCCF and CHXMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWCCF
1D Price
Change %
NWCCF100%
N/A
CHXMF - NWCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
LITM - NWCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.24%
SAGGF - NWCCF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMASF - NWCCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SLVDF - NWCCF
14%
Poorly correlated
+10.52%
More