Advertisement
LBTYA vs USM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBTYA is a Buy and USM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LBTYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LBTYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- USM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LBTYA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LBTYA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- USM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Reported Earning Dates
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
USM is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
| LBTYA | USM | LBTYA / USM | |
| Capitalization | 3.78B | 6.31B | 60% |
| EBITDA | -1.84B | 809M | -227% |
| Gain YTD | -13.558 | 18.383 | -74% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.00 | 65.84 | 3% |
| Revenue | 4.63B | 3.71B | 125% |
| Total Cash | 3.15B | 182M | 1,728% |
| Total Debt | 10.5B | 3.82B | 275% |
LBTYA | USM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LBTYA's Valuation (69) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as USM (87) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to USM’s over the last 12 months.
USM's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBTYA (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that USM’s stock grew significantly faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
USM's SMR Rating (91) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYA (96) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that USM’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
USM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYA (47) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that USM’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as USM (100) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to USM’s over the last 12 months.
| LBTYA | USM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IPFPX | 53.75 | 0.45 | +0.84% |
| Poplar Forest Partners Institutional | |||
| ACARX | 39.10 | 0.32 | +0.83% |
| Alger Capital Appreciation Instl R | |||
| RGLAX | 26.72 | 0.09 | +0.34% |
| American Funds Global Insight R-1 | |||
| AWPYX | 22.15 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| AB Sustainable Intl Thematic Advisor | |||
| JASCX | 40.55 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| James Small Cap | |||
USM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USM has been closely correlated with TDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USM jumps, then TDS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USM | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| TDS - USM | 85% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| AMX - USM | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| TMUS - USM | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
| SATS - USM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| T - USM | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||