Ad is loading...
LBWCX vs VVIAX
LBWCX vs VVIAX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs VVIAX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$18.27
Change-$0.18 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.61M
Vanguard Value Index Adm
Price$59.99
Change-$0.77 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.51B
LBWCX vs VVIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. VVIAX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and VVIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VVIAX has more cash in the bank: 191B vs. LBWCX (80.6M). VVIAX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: VVIAX (2.26) vs LBWCX (0.71). LBWCX was incepted earlier than VVIAX: LBWCX (15 years) vs VVIAX (24 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VVIAX (0.05). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VVIAX (10.00). LBWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VVIAX: LBWCX (1000) vs VVIAX (3000). VVIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.91 vs. LBWCX (-9.19). VVIAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.38 vs. LBWCX (25.52).
| LBWCX | VVIAX | LBWCX / VVIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.05 | 3,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.865 | -7.970 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 191B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 2.26 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.19 | -2.91 | 316% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.53 | 4.39 | -195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.52 | 60.38 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.44 | 83.85 | 1% |