Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCAGX vs RERFX
LCAGX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts LCAGX vs RERFX
Lord Abbett International Growth C
Price$15.35
Change-$0.23 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.54M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$59.02
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
LCAGX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. LCAGX (3.54M). RERFX pays higher dividends than LCAGX: RERFX (1.32) vs LCAGX (0.00). LCAGX was incepted earlier than RERFX: LCAGX (4 years) vs RERFX (23 years). LCAGX (10.12) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). LCAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCAGX: RERFX (250) vs LCAGX (1500). LCAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. RERFX (3.90).
| LCAGX | RERFX | LCAGX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.52 | 327% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.12 | 0.52 | 1,946% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.728 | 9.989 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.54M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.50 | 3.90 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.20 | 26.75 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.39 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement