Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBPX vs PCNNX
LCBPX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts LCBPX vs PCNNX
Western Asset Corporate Bond P
Price$10.51
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.43M
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$8.97
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
LCBPX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBPX vs. PCNNX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBPX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LCBPX (566M). LCBPX pays higher dividends than PCNNX: LCBPX (4.82) vs PCNNX (4.40). LCBPX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: LCBPX (16 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than LCBPX (1.10). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. LCBPX (102.00). LCBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCNNX: LCBPX (0) vs PCNNX (1000000). PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. LCBPX (4.78). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : -0.38 vs. LCBPX (-3.71).
| LCBPX | PCNNX | LCBPX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.24 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.29 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.328 | 2.488 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 12.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.82 | 4.40 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.78 | 5.66 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.25 | 12.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.71 | -0.38 | 988% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers