Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBPX vs PGCAX
LCBPX vs PGCAX Comparison
Open Charts LCBPX vs PGCAX
Western Asset Corporate Bond P
Price$10.51
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.82M
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Adm
Price$8.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.15B
LCBPX vs PGCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBPX vs. PGCAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBPX is a Hold and PGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGCAX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. LCBPX (570M). LCBPX pays higher dividends than PGCAX: LCBPX (4.82) vs PGCAX (4.30). LCBPX was incepted earlier than PGCAX: LCBPX (16 years) vs PGCAX (23 years). PGCAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than LCBPX (1.10). PGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. LCBPX (102.00). LCBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGCAX: LCBPX (0) vs PGCAX (1000000). PGCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. LCBPX (4.48). PGCAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.10 vs. LCBPX (-3.07).
| LCBPX | PGCAX | LCBPX / PGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.34 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.34 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.012 | 3.247 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 12.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.82 | 4.30 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 5.42 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.11 | 15.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.07 | -0.10 | 2,940% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.69 | 25.44 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement