Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBVX vs RMFCX
LCBVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCBVX vs RMFCX
LCBVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. LCBVX (2.44B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCBVX: RMFCX (1.15) vs LCBVX (0.47). LCBVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCBVX (13 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LCBVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. LCBVX (18.00). LCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LCBVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LCBVX (7.33) and RMFCX (7.12) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.84 vs. LCBVX (15.25).
| LCBVX | RMFCX | LCBVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.893 | 9.291 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.15 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 7.12 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.13 | 35.25 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.25 | 33.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.62 | 90.81 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement