Ad is loading...
LCIAX vs RWEBX
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCIAX vs RWEBX
SEI Large Cap Index A (SIIT)
Price$189.46
Change+$1.43 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$61.50
Change+$0.26 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.89B
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCIAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCIAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 187B vs. LCIAX (1.77B). LCIAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LCIAX (1.35) vs RWEBX (0.83). LCIAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCIAX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LCIAX (12.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: RWEBX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.41 vs. LCIAX (-3.60). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 75.23 vs. LCIAX (50.81).
| LCIAX | RWEBX | LCIAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.06 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.120 | 0.766 | -538% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 187B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.83 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.60 | 1.41 | -254% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.09 | 6.81 | -192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.81 | 75.23 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.63 | 56.15 | 58% |