Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCIAX vs RWEBX
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCIAX vs RWEBX
SEI Large Cap Index A (SIIT)
Price$209.80
Change+$1.77 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.15
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.46B
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCIAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCIAX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 200B vs. LCIAX (1.96B). LCIAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LCIAX (1.20) vs RWEBX (0.80). LCIAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCIAX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LCIAX (12.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: RWEBX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LCIAX (1.02). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.48 vs. LCIAX (30.67).
| LCIAX | RWEBX | LCIAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.06 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.442 | 5.319 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 200B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.80 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.02 | 7.02 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.34 | 29.59 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.67 | 52.48 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.64 | 65.56 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement