Ad is loading...
LCIAX vs RWEBX
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCIAX vs RWEBX
SEI Large Cap Index A (SIIT)
Price$182.66
Change+$3.70 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.92 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.95B
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCIAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCIAX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 179B vs. LCIAX (1.77B). LCIAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LCIAX (1.35) vs RWEBX (0.83). LCIAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCIAX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LCIAX (12.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: RWEBX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.52 vs. LCIAX (-5.56). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.55 vs. LCIAX (25.74).
| LCIAX | RWEBX | LCIAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.06 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.433 | -2.167 | 389% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 179B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.83 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.56 | 0.52 | -1,076% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.80 | 7.34 | -161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.74 | 51.55 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.29 | 49.16 | 49% |